THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 10:19–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1021013921916 Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibres, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: An overview. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 276-277:1–24. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:13.0.CO;2-W Monsoor MA (2005) Effect of drying methods on the functional properties of soy hull pectin. Carbohydrate Polymers 61:362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.06.009 Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chemical Society reviews 40:3941–94. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00108b Morales A, Kokini J (1997) Glass transition of soy globulins using differential scanning calorimetry and mechanical spectrometry. Biotechnology progress 13:624–629. Morgan R (1989) A generalized viscosity model for extrusion of protein doughs. Journal of Food Processing 1:55–78. Noguchi A (1989) Extrusion cooking of high-moisture protein foods. In: Mercier C, Linko P HJ (eds) Extrusion cooking. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, St. Paul, MN, pp 343–70 Nyström AM, Fadeel B (2012) Safety assessment of nanomaterials: Implications for nanomedicine. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 161:403–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.027 Otaigbe J, Goel H, Babcock T, Jane J (1999) Processability and properties of biodegradable plastics made from agricultural biopolymers. Journal of Elastomers and Plastics 31:56–71. doi: 10.1177/009524439903100104 Pelton JT, McLean LR (2000) Spectroscopic methods for analysis of protein secondary structure. Analytical biochemistry 277:167–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1999.4320 Pommet M, Redl a, Guilbert S, Morel M (2005) Intrinsic influence of various plasticizers on functional properties and reactivity of wheat gluten thermoplastic materials. Journal of Cereal Science 42:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.02.005 Pommet M, Redl A, Morel M-H, Domenek S, Guilbert S (2003) Thermoplastic processing of protein-based bioplastics: chemical engineering aspects of mixing, extrusion and hot molding. Macromolecular Symposia 197:207–218. doi: 10.1002/masy.200350719 Prudencio-Ferreira SH, Areas JG (1993) Protein-Protein Interactions in the Extrusion of Soya at Various Temperatures and Moisture Contents. Journal of food science 58:378–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb04279.x 116
Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, et al. (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941. Ralston BE (2008) Soy Protein Plastics: Material Formulation, Processing and Properties. PhD dissertation. University of Wisconsin - Madison Ralston BE, Osswald TA (2008) Viscosity of soy protein plastics determined by screw-driven capillary rheometry. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 16:169–176. doi: 10.1007/s10924-008-0098-3 Redl A, Guilbert S, Morel M-H (2003) Heat and shear mediated polymerization of plasticized wheat gluten protein upon mixing. Journal of Cereal Science 38:105–114. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(03)00003-1 Redl A, Morel M, Bonicel J, Guilbert S, Vergnes B (1999a) Rheological properties of gluten plasticized with glycerol: dependence on temperature, glycerol content and mixing conditions. Rheologica acta 38:311–320. Redl A, Morel M, Bonicel J, Vergnes B, Guilbert S (1999b) Extrusion of wheat gluten plasticized with glycerol: Influence of process conditions on flow behavior, rheological properties, and molecular size distribution. Cereal Chemistry 76:361–370. Rouilly A, Meriaux A, Geneau C, Silvestre F, Rigal L (2006) Film extrusion of sunflower protein isolate. Polymer Engineering 46:1635–1640. doi: 10.1002/pen Sain M, Oksman K (2006) Introduction to Cellulose Nanocomposites. In: Oksman K, Sain M (eds) Cellulose Nanocomposites Processing, Characterization, and Properties. American Chemical Society, pp 2–8 Sain M, Panthapulakkal S (2006) Bioprocess preparation of wheat straw fibers and their characterization. Industrial Crops and Products 23:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2005.01.006 Schmidt V, Giacomelli C, Soldi V (2005) Thermal stability of films formed by soy protein isolate– sodium dodecyl sulfate. Polymer Degradation and Stability 87:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.07.003 Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin a. E, Conrad CM (1959) An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 29:786–794. doi: 10.1177/004051755902901003 Siffert B, Metzger J-M (1991) Study of the interaction of titanium dioxide with cellulose fibers in an aqueous medium. Colloids and Surfaces 53:79–99. doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(91)80037- O Sills DL, Gossett JM (2011) Using FTIR to predict saccharification from enzymatic hydrolysis of alkali-pretreated biomasses. Biotechnology and bioengineering 109:353–362. doi: 10.1002/bit.23314 117
Page 1 and 2:
A Study on the Extrusion of Soy Pro
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My research would
Page 5 and 6:
4.3.9 Statistical Analysis.........
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Compariso
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 5.2: Light optical microscop
Page 11 and 12:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The production of
Page 13 and 14:
einforcement material. Research int
Page 15 and 16:
via centrifugation into four fracti
Page 17 and 18:
zones are synonymous to feeding, tr
Page 19 and 20:
Ralston (2008) investigated the ext
Page 21 and 22:
onding between hydroxyl groups and
Page 23 and 24:
Table 2.2: Summary of cellulose par
Page 25 and 26:
through the use of enzymes have pro
Page 27 and 28:
matrix such as soy protein (Wang et
Page 29 and 30:
4) Explore the extraction process f
Page 31 and 32:
4.3 METHODS 4.3.1 SAMPLE PREPARATIO
Page 33 and 34:
a Figure 4.2: a) Schematic of extru
Page 35 and 36:
length at break by the initial grip
Page 37 and 38:
4.4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.4.1 SP
Page 39 and 40:
Further experiments were carried ou
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 4.5: Film with rough texture
Page 43 and 44:
extrusion screw to continuously bre
Page 45 and 46:
stopped which fixes the spherical s
Page 47 and 48:
4.4.3 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Mechani
Page 49 and 50:
Elongation at break (%) Figure 4.10
Page 51 and 52:
Table 4.5: Water vapor permeability
Page 53 and 54:
4.4.5 FTIR ANALYSIS The main absorb
Page 55 and 56:
4.4.6 CONCLUSION The extrusion of S
Page 57 and 58:
5.3 METHODS 5.3.1 CELLULOSE EXTRACT
Page 59 and 60:
For mechanical treatments, the obta
Page 61 and 62:
initial soy biomass; SNF and SMF. T
Page 63 and 64:
compiled by Moon et al. (2011), thi
Page 65 and 66:
RSH: 5min HPH: 20 passes, 4000 - 60
Page 67 and 68:
SMF micrographs, the presence of fi
Page 69 and 70:
process as described. However, it m
Page 71 and 72:
a peak at 22.6° is representative
Page 73 and 74:
chemical and mechanical treatment h
Page 75 and 76: 6.3 METHODS 6.3.1 SAMPLE PREPARATIO
Page 77 and 78: 6.3.3 FILM CONDITIONING Similar to
Page 79 and 80: increased in size. At fiber concent
Page 81 and 82: 6.4.2 MORPHOLOGY AND STRUCTURE Due
Page 83 and 84: SEM images of the cryo-fractured su
Page 85 and 86: Table 6.1: Mechanical properties of
Page 87 and 88: cellulose and SPI. This high interf
Page 89 and 90: concentrations at isolated sites. A
Page 91 and 92: Similar to Section 4.4.5, dominatin
Page 93 and 94: Further analysis of the Amide II ba
Page 95 and 96: specimens that have been cryo-crush
Page 97 and 98: crushing. Conversely, this could al
Page 99 and 100: 7.0 EXPLORATORY WORK WITH TIO 2 NAN
Page 101 and 102: 7.3.2 COMPOUNDING AND EXTRUSION Com
Page 103 and 104: smaller size of P90, the ability to
Page 105 and 106: Table 7.1: Mechanical Strength of T
Page 107 and 108: Modulus of Elasticity (MPa) 120 110
Page 109 and 110: (21 nm) particle was seen to have a
Page 111 and 112: 7.4.3 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TIO2
Page 113 and 114: Tensile Strenght (MPa) 12 11 10 9 8
Page 115 and 116: Modulus of Elasticity (MPa) 200 180
Page 117 and 118: 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 119 and 120: The viability of introducing a comp
Page 121 and 122: acting as a coupling agent for furt
Page 123 and 124: Cherian BM, Leao AL, Souza SFD, Tho
Page 125: Kacurakova M, Capek P, Sasinkova V,
Page 129: Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2008) Prep
show all

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?