30.11.2012 Views

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.4.2 MORPHOLOGY AND STRUCTURE<br />

Due to the appearance <strong>of</strong> aggregated fragments, homogeneity <strong>of</strong> fiber dispersion was a<br />

topic <strong>of</strong> concern. Upon examination <strong>of</strong> the films under polarized light (Figure 6.3), it was<br />

revealed that although mixing was not optimal, the clumping <strong>of</strong> fibers were independent<br />

occurrences unrelated to overall dispersibility. Fibers were seen to be randomly spread<br />

throughout the films.<br />

SPI NSF0.25 SMF0.25 SMF0.5 SMF1.0 SMF2.5<br />

Figure 6.3: Image <strong>of</strong> 1 inch wide specimens <strong>of</strong> SPI/cellulose blend films seen through a cross<br />

polarized light filter. Circled are clusters <strong>of</strong> aggregated cellulose fibers.<br />

Further analysis using OM under cross polarized light confirmed that the overall<br />

dispersion <strong>of</strong> fibers within the protein films is even and throughout (Figure 6.4). A large size<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> fibers was also observed as expected. With increasing concentrations, the overall<br />

density <strong>of</strong> fibers was seen to increase. From 0.25 to 0.5% w/w SMF/SPI, the presence <strong>of</strong> larger<br />

fiber diameters was more prominent for the SMF0.5 specimen. At concentrations beyond 1%<br />

w/w SPI, the random presence <strong>of</strong> aggregates began to appear with more occurrences at 2.5%<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!