30.11.2012 Views

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6.1: Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> SPI/cellulose extruded films with respect to fiber content and<br />

relative humidity<br />

Relative<br />

Ultimate Tensile<br />

Modulus <strong>of</strong><br />

Humidity Specimen Strength Elongation Elasticity<br />

(%) (MPa) (%) (MPa)<br />

43 Control 6.51 ± 0.15 a<br />

43 SNF 0.25 6.82 ± 0.14 b<br />

43 SMF 0.25 6.91 ± 0.07 b<br />

43 SMF 0.5 6.34 ± 0.11 a<br />

43 SMF 1 6.00 ± 0.21 c<br />

43 SMF 2.5 5.02 ± 0.08 d<br />

75<br />

222.53 ± 0.25 a,b<br />

195.68 ± 0.20 a,b<br />

208.67 ± 0.18 a,b<br />

238.27 ± 0.21 a,b<br />

168.75 ± 0.11 b,c<br />

111.84 ± 0.36 c<br />

65.55 ± 3.56 a<br />

79.68 ± 6.51 b,c<br />

85.26 ± 5.14 c<br />

59.71 ± 3.50 a<br />

70.72 ± 9.03 a,b<br />

62.73 ± 4.40 a<br />

58 Control 4.96 ± 0.18 a,b<br />

212.75 ± 20.00 a,b<br />

41.02 ± 5.78 a,b<br />

58 SNF 0.25 5.43 ± 0.13 b,c<br />

233.17 ± 20.49 b<br />

46.47 ± 3.29 a<br />

58 SMF 0.25 5.54 ± 0.46 c<br />

190.75 ± 23.35 a<br />

48.08 ± 6.70 a<br />

58 SMF 0.5 4.73 ± 0.11 a<br />

228.27 ± 14.51 b<br />

36.81 ± 3.78 b<br />

58 SMF 1 4.72 ± 0.25 a<br />

187.01 ± 15.72 a<br />

41.79 ± 4.23 a,b<br />

58 SMF 2.5 4.84 ± 0.29 a<br />

103.49 ± 10.73 c<br />

46.31 ± 2.13 a<br />

84 Control 3.91 ± 0.20 a,b<br />

211.43 ± 34.29 a,b<br />

23.36 ± 3.45 a<br />

84 SNF 0.25 4.39 ± 0.12 b<br />

242.00 ± 23.45 b<br />

30.90 ± 2.54 a<br />

84 SMF 0.25 5.64 ± 0.41 c<br />

183.70 ± 18.08 a<br />

45.21 ± 7.72 b<br />

84 SMF 0.5 4.33 ± 0.11 b<br />

212.34 ± 18.66 a,b<br />

27.43 ± 3.03 a<br />

84 SMF 1 4.23 ± 0.26 a,b<br />

169.33 ± 18.90 a<br />

29.09 ± 3.26 a<br />

84 SMF 2.5 3.75 ± 0.38 a<br />

118.85 ± 26.83 c<br />

29.27 ± 1.52 a<br />

For each relative humidity, means with different letters in the same column are<br />

significantly different (N=5, Tukey’s HSD, p-value < 0.05)<br />

Similar to findings from Section 4.3.4, a negative correlation between ultimate tensile<br />

strength and relative humidity can be seen (Figure 6.6). This relationship is a common problem<br />

experienced by current research into protein films (Hernandez-Izquierdo and Krochta 2008;<br />

Song et al. 2011; Zhang and Mittal 2010; Zhang et al. 2001). The hydrophilic nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

protein is responsible for the weakening <strong>of</strong> the protein structure. As water is a natural<br />

plasticizing agent, increased water content would allow for increased protein chain mobility<br />

leading to a weakening in tensile strength (Zhang et al. 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!