THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph
THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph
THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 6.1: Mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> SPI/cellulose extruded films with respect to fiber content and<br />
relative humidity<br />
Relative<br />
Ultimate Tensile<br />
Modulus <strong>of</strong><br />
Humidity Specimen Strength Elongation Elasticity<br />
(%) (MPa) (%) (MPa)<br />
43 Control 6.51 ± 0.15 a<br />
43 SNF 0.25 6.82 ± 0.14 b<br />
43 SMF 0.25 6.91 ± 0.07 b<br />
43 SMF 0.5 6.34 ± 0.11 a<br />
43 SMF 1 6.00 ± 0.21 c<br />
43 SMF 2.5 5.02 ± 0.08 d<br />
75<br />
222.53 ± 0.25 a,b<br />
195.68 ± 0.20 a,b<br />
208.67 ± 0.18 a,b<br />
238.27 ± 0.21 a,b<br />
168.75 ± 0.11 b,c<br />
111.84 ± 0.36 c<br />
65.55 ± 3.56 a<br />
79.68 ± 6.51 b,c<br />
85.26 ± 5.14 c<br />
59.71 ± 3.50 a<br />
70.72 ± 9.03 a,b<br />
62.73 ± 4.40 a<br />
58 Control 4.96 ± 0.18 a,b<br />
212.75 ± 20.00 a,b<br />
41.02 ± 5.78 a,b<br />
58 SNF 0.25 5.43 ± 0.13 b,c<br />
233.17 ± 20.49 b<br />
46.47 ± 3.29 a<br />
58 SMF 0.25 5.54 ± 0.46 c<br />
190.75 ± 23.35 a<br />
48.08 ± 6.70 a<br />
58 SMF 0.5 4.73 ± 0.11 a<br />
228.27 ± 14.51 b<br />
36.81 ± 3.78 b<br />
58 SMF 1 4.72 ± 0.25 a<br />
187.01 ± 15.72 a<br />
41.79 ± 4.23 a,b<br />
58 SMF 2.5 4.84 ± 0.29 a<br />
103.49 ± 10.73 c<br />
46.31 ± 2.13 a<br />
84 Control 3.91 ± 0.20 a,b<br />
211.43 ± 34.29 a,b<br />
23.36 ± 3.45 a<br />
84 SNF 0.25 4.39 ± 0.12 b<br />
242.00 ± 23.45 b<br />
30.90 ± 2.54 a<br />
84 SMF 0.25 5.64 ± 0.41 c<br />
183.70 ± 18.08 a<br />
45.21 ± 7.72 b<br />
84 SMF 0.5 4.33 ± 0.11 b<br />
212.34 ± 18.66 a,b<br />
27.43 ± 3.03 a<br />
84 SMF 1 4.23 ± 0.26 a,b<br />
169.33 ± 18.90 a<br />
29.09 ± 3.26 a<br />
84 SMF 2.5 3.75 ± 0.38 a<br />
118.85 ± 26.83 c<br />
29.27 ± 1.52 a<br />
For each relative humidity, means with different letters in the same column are<br />
significantly different (N=5, Tukey’s HSD, p-value < 0.05)<br />
Similar to findings from Section 4.3.4, a negative correlation between ultimate tensile<br />
strength and relative humidity can be seen (Figure 6.6). This relationship is a common problem<br />
experienced by current research into protein films (Hernandez-Izquierdo and Krochta 2008;<br />
Song et al. 2011; Zhang and Mittal 2010; Zhang et al. 2001). The hydrophilic nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
protein is responsible for the weakening <strong>of</strong> the protein structure. As water is a natural<br />
plasticizing agent, increased water content would allow for increased protein chain mobility<br />
leading to a weakening in tensile strength (Zhang et al. 2001).