12.07.2015 Views

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CORPORATE R&DMajority-owned foreign affiliates <strong>of</strong> U.S. parent companies spent about 22 billion dollars onR&D abroad in 2003. Developed economies dominated as locations for R&D but the share<strong>of</strong> developing countries increased from 7.6 percent in 1994 to 15 percent in 2003. Mainlycountries in developing Asia, such as China, Singapore and Korea, compensated for thedeclining share <strong>of</strong> developed countries. In Asia (excluding Japan), computers and electronicproducts was the dominating industry sector for R&D investment. Sweden ranked fourth inEurope (after U.K., Germany and France) and accounted for 1.4 billion dollars (6 percent)<strong>of</strong> R&D spending by U.S. affiliates abroad (BEA 2005).A number <strong>of</strong> survey studies confirm that corporate R&D spending abroad is increasing (seefor example Roberts 2001, von Zedtwitz & Gassmann 2002, BusinessWeek 2005 andUNCTAD 2005a).From a country perspective, the level <strong>of</strong> internationalization can be measured both in terms<strong>of</strong> industrial R&D activates abroad (home country) and domestic activities <strong>of</strong> foreign companies(host country). For example, Germany and Finland are more internationalized abroadthan in the domestic market, while in the U.S., Japan and Sweden, in terms <strong>of</strong> total industry,R&D is more internationalized in the domestic market (OECD 2005c).2.3.3 Trade in R&D – Technology Balance <strong>of</strong> PaymentIn most OECD countries, technology receipts and payments increased during the1990s. Obviously, the OECD area was a net technology exporter to the rest <strong>of</strong> theworld, while the European Union had a deficit on its technology balance <strong>of</strong> payments.Japan increased its positive trade balance dramatically from almost nothing in 1993 to0.2 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP in 2003. <strong>The</strong> U.S. had a stable positive trade balance during the1990s <strong>of</strong> 0.25 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. <strong>The</strong> U.K. was a major net exporter (almost 0.8 percent<strong>of</strong> GDP) while Ireland was a major net importer (over 10 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP), see Figure2-8. In absolute terms, the U.S. net trade balance (receipts minus payments) was thelargest (over 28 billion dollars) followed by the U.K. (13 billion dollars) and Japan(8 billion dollars) (OECD 2005c, MSTI 2005).69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!