12.07.2015 Views

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF CORPORATE R&DAnother study using patent data between 1996 and 2000 shows that European companieshad a greater tendency to locate R&D activities abroad than American and Japanesecompanies. <strong>The</strong> study also confirmed that multinational companies from smallcountries, like Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland, had the highest degrees<strong>of</strong> internationalization <strong>of</strong> corporate R&D (Criscuolo & Patel 2003).2.3.5 R&D Collaboration and Alliances<strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> newly established international strategic technology alliances has increasedconsiderably since the 1980s, according to studies based on the CooperativeAgreements and Technology Indicators database (MERIT CATI). However, during thesame period, the share <strong>of</strong> international R&D partnerships in relation to the total number<strong>of</strong> R&D partnerships has declined. <strong>The</strong> share <strong>of</strong> international R&D partnerships fellbelow 50 percent during the late 1990s. <strong>The</strong> largest share <strong>of</strong> R&D partnerships in thedatabase was intra-North America (about 41 percent during the 1990s) followed byEU-North America partnerships (25 percent). <strong>The</strong> strong growth <strong>of</strong> intra-NorthAmerica collaboration largely explains why international partnerships, despite growthin absolute numbers, still take only about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> R&D partnerships(Hagedoorn 2002).<strong>The</strong> industry composition <strong>of</strong> alliances shifted strongly between 1991 and 2001. <strong>The</strong> share<strong>of</strong> pharmaceuticals and biotechnology grew from 11 to 58 percent while alliances in theinformation technology industry declined from 54 to 28 percent (UNCTAD 2005a).Other surveys confirm that most cooperative agreements were found to be with national,rather than international, partners. More than 80 percent <strong>of</strong> partnerships amonginnovative European companies involved national partners in both manufacturing andservices during the late 1990s (Eurostat-CIS survey, OECD 2005a).Data for U.S. companies in MERIT CATI shows that about 80 percent <strong>of</strong> technologyalliances from 1991 to 2001 involved at least one U.S.-owned company. Of these alliances,about half involved only U.S.-owned companies (regardless <strong>of</strong> where the companieswere located) (NSF 2004, see also NSF 2006).2.3.6 Surveys <strong>of</strong> Foreign R&D Facilities and ProjectsA number <strong>of</strong> surveys <strong>of</strong> company-level data also reflect the increasing internationalization<strong>of</strong> corporate R&D. In 1992, the U.S. was host for 250 foreign R&D facilities, <strong>of</strong>which many were newly established. <strong>The</strong> number grew rapidly to 715 facilities ownedby 375 foreign parent companies in 1997. Two hundred fifty-one <strong>of</strong> the facilities wereestablished by companies from Japan, followed by Germany, UK and France. At thesame time the U.S. had established 169 R&D facilities abroad, 88 in Europe and 45 inJapan (Dalton & Serapio 1999). See also a similar study in Kuemmerle 1999.72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!