13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

William JamesIf you open the chapter on Association, <strong>of</strong> any treatise on Psychology,you will read that a man’s ideas, aims, and objects formdiverse internal groups and systems, relatively independent <strong>of</strong> oneanother. Each ‘aim’ which he follows awakens a certain specific kind<strong>of</strong> interested excitement, and gathers a certain group <strong>of</strong> ideas togetherin subordination to it as its associates; and if the aims andexcitements are distinct in kind, their groups <strong>of</strong> ideas may have littlein common. When one group is present and engrosses the interest,all the ideas connected with other groups may be excluded from themental field. <strong>The</strong> President <strong>of</strong> the United <strong>State</strong>s when, with paddle,gun, and fishing-rod, he goes camping in the wilderness for a vacation,changes his system <strong>of</strong> ideas from top to bottom. <strong>The</strong> presidentialanxieties have lapsed into the background entirely; the <strong>of</strong>ficialhabits are replaced by the habits <strong>of</strong> a son <strong>of</strong> nature, and those whoknew the man only as the strenuous magistrate would not “knowhim for the same person” if they saw him as the camper.If now he should never go back, and never again suffer politicalinterests to gain dominion over him, he would be for practical intentsand purposes a permanently transformed being. Our ordinaryalterations <strong>of</strong> character, as we pass from one <strong>of</strong> our aims to another,are not commonly called transformations, because each <strong>of</strong> them isso rapidly succeeded by another in the reverse direction; but wheneverone aim grows so stable as to expel definitively its previousrivals from the individual’s life, we tend to speak <strong>of</strong> the phenomenon,and perhaps to wonder at it, as a “transformation.”<strong>The</strong>se alternations are the completest <strong>of</strong> the ways in which a selfmay be divided. A less complete way is the simultaneous coexistence<strong>of</strong> two or more different groups <strong>of</strong> aims, <strong>of</strong> which one practicallyholds the right <strong>of</strong> way and instigates activity, whilst the othersare only pious wishes, and never practically come to anything. SaintAugustine’s aspirations to a purer life, in our last lecture, were for awhile an example. Another would be the President in his full pride<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, wondering whether it were not all vanity, and whether thelife <strong>of</strong> a wood-chopper were not the wholesomer destiny. Such fleetingaspirations are mere velleitates, whimsies. <strong>The</strong>y exist on the remoteroutskirts <strong>of</strong> the mind, and the real self <strong>of</strong> the man, the centre<strong>of</strong> his energies, is occupied with an entirely different system. As life179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!