13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Varieties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Religious</strong> <strong>Experience</strong>Pure anachronism! says the survival-theory;—anachronism forwhich deanthropomorphization <strong>of</strong> the imagination is the remedyrequired. <strong>The</strong> less we mix the private with the cosmic, the more wedwell in universal and impersonal terms, the truer heirs <strong>of</strong> Sciencewe become.earthworms, the usnia, or mossy growth on the weathered skull <strong>of</strong> a hangedcriminal, and other materials equally unpleasant—the whole preparedunder the planet Venus if possible, but never under Mars or Saturn. <strong>The</strong>n,if a splinter <strong>of</strong> wood, dipped in the patient’s blood, or the bloodstainedweapon that wounded him, be immersed in this ointment, the wounditself being tightly bound up, the latter infallibly gets well—I quote nowVan Helmont’s account—for the blood on the weapon or splinter, containingin it the spirit <strong>of</strong> the wounded man, is roused to active excitementby the contact <strong>of</strong> the ointment, whence there results to it a full commissionor power to cure its cousin-german the blood in the patient’s body.This it does by sucking out the dolorous and exotic impression from thewounded part. But to do this it has to implore the aid <strong>of</strong> the bull’s fat, andother portions <strong>of</strong> the unguent. <strong>The</strong> reason why bull’s fat is so powerful isthat the bull at the time <strong>of</strong> slaughter is full <strong>of</strong> secret reluctancy and vindictivemurmurs, and therefore dies with a higher flame <strong>of</strong> revenge abouthim than any other animal. And thus we have made it out, says this author,that the admirable efficacy <strong>of</strong> the ointment ought to be imputed,not to any auxiliary concurrence <strong>of</strong> Satan, but simply to the energy <strong>of</strong> theposthumous character <strong>of</strong> Revenge remaining firmly impressed upon theblood and concreted fat in the unguent. J. B. Van Helmont: A Ternary <strong>of</strong>Paradoxes, translated by Walter Charleton, London, 1650.—I muchabridge the original in my citations.<strong>The</strong> author goes on to prove by the analogy <strong>of</strong> many other natural factsthat this sympathetic action between things at a distance is the true rationale<strong>of</strong> the case. “If,” he says, “the heart <strong>of</strong> a horse slain by a witch, takenout <strong>of</strong> the yet reeking carcase, be impaled upon an arrow and roasted,immediately the whole witch becomes tormented with the insufferablepains and cruelty <strong>of</strong> the fire, which could by no means happen unlessthere preceded a conjunction <strong>of</strong> the spirit <strong>of</strong> the witch with the spirit <strong>of</strong>the horse. In the reeking and yet panting heart, the spirit <strong>of</strong> the witch iskept captive, and the retreat <strong>of</strong> it prevented by the arrow transfixed. Similarlyhath not many a murdered carcase at the coroner’s inquest suffered afresh haemorrhage or cruentation at the presence <strong>of</strong> the assassin?—the442

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!