13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

William Jamesinfinite anonymous chaos <strong>of</strong> objects that no one ever thought <strong>of</strong>together, <strong>of</strong> relations that never yet attracted our attention.<strong>The</strong> facts <strong>of</strong> order from which the physico-theological argumentstarts are thus easily susceptible <strong>of</strong> interpretation as arbitrary humanproducts. So long as this is the case, although <strong>of</strong> course noargument against God follows, it follows that the argument for himwill fail to constitute a knockdown pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> his existence. It will beconvincing only to those who on other grounds believe in him already.If philosophy can do so little to establish God’s existence, howstands it with her efforts to define his attributes? It is worth while tolook at the attempts <strong>of</strong> systematic theology in this direction.Since God is First Cause, this science <strong>of</strong> sciences says, he differsfrom all his creatures in possessing existence a se. From this “a-seity”on God’s part, theology deduces by mere logic most <strong>of</strong> his otherperfections. For instance, he must be both necessary and absolute,cannot not be, and cannot in any way be determined by anythingelse. This makes Him absolutely unlimited from without, and unlimitedalso from within; for limitation is non-being; and God isbeing itself. This unlimitedness makes God infinitely perfect. Moreover,God is one, and only, for the infinitely perfect can admit nopeer. He is spiritual, for were He composed <strong>of</strong> physical parts, someother power would have to combine them into the total, and hisaseity would thus be contradicted. He is therefore both simple andnon-physical in nature. He is simple metaphysically also, that is tosay, his nature and his existence cannot be distinct, as they are infinite substances which share their formal natures with one another,and are individual only in their material aspect. Since God is oneand only, his essentia and his esse must be given at one stroke. Thisexcludes from his being all those distinctions, so familiar in the world<strong>of</strong> finite things, between potentiality and actuality, substance andaccidents, being and activity, existence and attributes. We can talk,it is true, <strong>of</strong> God’s powers, acts, and attributes, but these discriminationsare only “virtual,” and made from the human point <strong>of</strong> view.In God all these points <strong>of</strong> view fall into an absolute identity <strong>of</strong> being.This absence <strong>of</strong> all potentiality in God obliges Him to be immu-391

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!