13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

William Jameshas shown itself to consist everywhere, and at all its stages, in theconsciousness which individuals have <strong>of</strong> an intercourse between themselvesand higher powers with which they feel themselves to be related.This intercourse is realized at the time as being both active andmutual. If it be not effective; if it be not a give and take relation; ifnothing be really transacted while it lasts; if the world is in no whitdifferent for its having taken place; then prayer, taken in this widemeaning <strong>of</strong> a sense that something is transacting, is <strong>of</strong> course a feeling<strong>of</strong> what is illusory, and religion must on the whole be classed, notsimply as containing elements <strong>of</strong> delusion—these undoubtedly everywhereexist—but as being rooted in delusion altogether, just asmaterialists and atheists have always said it was. At most there mightremain, when the direct experiences <strong>of</strong> prayer were ruled out as falsewitnesses, some inferential belief that the whole order <strong>of</strong> existencemust have a divine cause. But this way <strong>of</strong> contemplating nature, pleasingas it would doubtless be to persons <strong>of</strong> a pious taste, would leave tothem but the spectators’ part at a play, whereas in experimental religionand the prayerful life, we seem ourselves to be actors, and not ina play, but in a very serious reality.<strong>The</strong> genuineness <strong>of</strong> religion is thus indissolubly bound up withthe question whether the prayerful consciousness be or be not deceitful.<strong>The</strong> conviction that something is genuinely transacted inthis consciousness is the very core <strong>of</strong> living religion. As to what istransacted, great differences <strong>of</strong> opinion have prevailed. <strong>The</strong> unseenpowers have been supposed, and are yet supposed, to do things whichno enlightened man can nowadays believe in. It may well prove thatthe sphere <strong>of</strong> influence in prayer is subjective exclusively, and thatwhat is immediately changed is only the mind <strong>of</strong> the praying person.But however our opinion <strong>of</strong> prayer’s effects may come to belimited by criticism, religion, in the vital sense in which these lecturesstudy it, must stand or fall by the persuasion that effects <strong>of</strong>some sort genuinely do occur. Through prayer, religion insists, thingswhich cannot be realized in any other manner come about: energywhich but for prayer would be bound is by prayer set free and operatesin some part, be it objective or subjective, <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>of</strong> facts.This postulate is strikingly expressed in a letter written by the lateFrederic W. H. Myers to a friend, who allows me to quote from it. It413

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!