13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

William Jamesity. He is omnipotent for everything that does not involve logicalcontradiction. He can make being —in other words his power includescreation. If what He creates were made <strong>of</strong> his own substance,it would have to be infinite in essence, as that substance is; but it isfinite; so it must be non-divine in substance. If it were made <strong>of</strong> asubstance, an eternally existing matter, for example, which Godfound there to his hand, and to which He simply gave its form, thatwould contradict God’s definition as First Cause, and make Him amere mover <strong>of</strong> something caused already. <strong>The</strong> things he creates,then, He creates ex nihilo, and gives them absolute being as so manyfinite substances additional to himself. <strong>The</strong> forms which he imprintsupon them have their prototypes in his ideas. But as in God there isno such thing as multiplicity, and as these ideas for us are manifold,we must distinguish the ideas as they are in God and the way inwhich our minds externally imitate them. We must attribute themto Him only in a terminative sense, as differing aspects, from thefinite point <strong>of</strong> view, <strong>of</strong> his unique essence.God <strong>of</strong> course is holy, good, and just. He can do no evil, for He ispositive being’s fullness, and evil is negation. It is true that He hascreated physical evil in places, but only as a means <strong>of</strong> wider good,for bonum totius praeeminet bonum partis. Moral evil He cannotwill, either as end or means, for that would contradict his holiness.By creating free beings He permits it only, neither his justice nor hisgoodness obliging Him to prevent the recipients <strong>of</strong> freedom frommisusing the gift.As regards God’s purpose in creating, primarily it can only havebeen to exercise his absolute freedom by the manifestation to others<strong>of</strong> his glory. From this it follows that the others must be rationalbeings, capable in the first place <strong>of</strong> knowledge, love, and honor, andin the second place <strong>of</strong> happiness, for the knowledge and love <strong>of</strong>God is the mainspring <strong>of</strong> felicity. In so far forth one may say thatGod’s secondary purpose in creating is love.I will not weary you by pursuing these metaphysical determinationsfarther, into the mysteries <strong>of</strong> God’s Trinity, for example. WhatI have given will serve as a specimen <strong>of</strong> the orthodox philosophicaltheology <strong>of</strong> both Catholics and Protestants. Newman, filled withenthusiasm at God’s list <strong>of</strong> perfections, continues the passage which393

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!