13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

William Jamesmals’ habits, and keeping up a fire <strong>of</strong> invective against the “closetnaturalists,”as he called them, the collectors and classifiers, andhandlers <strong>of</strong> skeletons and skins. When I was a boy, I used to thinkthat a closet-naturalist must be the vilest type <strong>of</strong> wretch under thesun. But surely the systematic theologians are the closet-naturalists<strong>of</strong> the deity, even in Captain Mayne Reid’s sense. What is their deduction<strong>of</strong> metaphysical attributes but a shuffling and matching <strong>of</strong>pedantic dictionary-adjectives, alo<strong>of</strong> from morals, alo<strong>of</strong> from humanneeds, something that might be worked out from the mereword “God” by one <strong>of</strong> those logical machines <strong>of</strong> wood and brasswhich recent ingenuity has contrived as well as by a man <strong>of</strong> fleshand blood. <strong>The</strong>y have the trail <strong>of</strong> the serpent over them. One feelsthat in the theologians’ hands, they are only a set <strong>of</strong> titles obtainedby a mechanical manipulation <strong>of</strong> synonyms; verbality has steppedinto the place <strong>of</strong> vision, pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism into that <strong>of</strong> life. Instead <strong>of</strong>bread we have a stone; instead <strong>of</strong> a fish, a serpent. Did such a conglomeration<strong>of</strong> abstract terms give really the gist <strong>of</strong> our knowledge<strong>of</strong> the deity, schools <strong>of</strong> theology might indeed continue to flourish,but religion, vital religion, would have taken its flight from thisworld. What keeps religion going is something else than abstractdefinitions and systems <strong>of</strong> concatenated adjectives, and somethingdifferent from faculties <strong>of</strong> theology and their pr<strong>of</strong>essors. All thesethings are after-effects, secondary accretions upon those phenomena<strong>of</strong> vital conversation with the unseen divine, <strong>of</strong> which I haveshown you so many instances, renewing themselves in saeculasaeculorum in the lives <strong>of</strong> humble private men.So much for the metaphysical attributes <strong>of</strong> God! From the point<strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> practical religion, the metaphysical monster which they<strong>of</strong>fer to our worship is an absolutely worthless invention <strong>of</strong> the scholarlymind.What shall we now say <strong>of</strong> the attributes called moral? Pragmatically,they stand on an entirely different footing. <strong>The</strong>y positivelydetermine fear and hope and expectation, and are foundations forthe saintly life. It needs but a glance at them to show how great istheir significance.God’s holiness, for example: being holy, God can will nothing butthe good. Being omnipotent, he can secure its triumph. Being om-397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!