13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Varieties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Religious</strong> <strong>Experience</strong>the cruelty and the sympathy each ring true, and do not mix orinterfere with one another, so did the Greeks and Romans keepall their sadnesses and gladnesses unmingled and entire. Instinctivegood they did not reckon sin; nor had they any such desireto save the credit <strong>of</strong> the universe as to make them insist, as somany <strong>of</strong> US insist, that what immediately appears as evil mustbe “good in the making,” or something equally ingenious. Goodwas good, and bad just bad, for the earlier Greeks. <strong>The</strong>y neitherdenied the ills <strong>of</strong> nature—Walt Whitman’s verse, “What is calledgood is perfect and what is called bad is just as perfect,” wouldhave been mere silliness to them—nor did they, in order to escapefrom those ills, invent “another and a better world” <strong>of</strong> theimagination, in which, along with the ills, the innocent goods <strong>of</strong>sense would also find no place. This integrity <strong>of</strong> the instinctivereactions, this freedom from all moral sophistry and strain, givesa pathetic dignity to ancient pagan feeling. And this qualityWhitman’s outpourings have not got. His optimism is too voluntaryand defiant; his gospel has a touch <strong>of</strong> bravado and anaffected twist,42 and this diminishes its effect on many readerswho yet are well disposed towards optimism, and on the wholequite willing to admit that in important respects Whitman is <strong>of</strong>the genuine lineage <strong>of</strong> the prophets.If, then, we give the name <strong>of</strong> healthy-mindedness to the tendencywhich looks on all things and sees that they are good, we find thatwe must distinguish between a more involuntary and a more voluntaryor systematic way <strong>of</strong> being healthy-minded. In its involuntaryvariety, healthy-mindedness is a way <strong>of</strong> feeling happy about thingsimmediately. In its systematical variety, it is an abstract way <strong>of</strong> conceivingthings as good. Every abstract way <strong>of</strong> conceiving things selectssome one aspect <strong>of</strong> them as their essence for the time being,and disregards the other aspects. Systematic healthy-mindedness,conceiving good as the essential and universal aspect <strong>of</strong> being, de-42 “God is afraid <strong>of</strong> me!” remarked such a titanic-optimistic friend in mypresence one morning when he was feeling particularly hearty and cannibalistic.<strong>The</strong> defiance <strong>of</strong> the phrase showed that a Christian education inhumility still rankled in his breast.84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!