13.07.2015 Views

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

The Varieties of Religious Experience - Penn State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Varieties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Religious</strong> <strong>Experience</strong>the American people has never been better shown than by the factthat this, their only decidedly original contribution to the systematicphilosophy <strong>of</strong> life, should be so intimately knit up with concrete therapeutics.To the importance <strong>of</strong> mind-cure the medical and clerical pr<strong>of</strong>essionsin the United <strong>State</strong>s are beginning, though with much recalcitrancyand protesting, to open their eyes. It is evidently bound todevelop still farther, both speculatively and practically, and its latestwriters are far and away the ablest <strong>of</strong> the group.45 It matters nothingthat, just as there are hosts <strong>of</strong> persons who cannot pray, so there aregreater hosts who cannot by any possibility be influenced by the mindcurers’ideas. For our immediate purpose, the important point is thatso large a number should exist who CAN be so influenced. <strong>The</strong>yform a psychic type to be studied with respect.4645 I refer to Mr. Horatio W. Dresser and Mr. Henry Wood, especially theformer. Mr. Dresser’s works are published by G. P. Putnam’s Sons, NewYork and London; Mr. Wood’s by Lee & Shepard Boston.46 Lest my own testimony be suspected, I will quote another reporter, Dr.H. H. Goddard, <strong>of</strong> Clark <strong>University</strong>, whose thesis on “the Effects <strong>of</strong> Mindon Body as evidenced by Faith Cures” is published in the American Journal<strong>of</strong> Psychology for 1899 (vol. x.). This critic, after a wide study <strong>of</strong> thefacts, concludes that the cures by mind-cure exist, but are in no respectdifferent from those now <strong>of</strong>ficially recognized in medicine as cures bysuggestion; and the end <strong>of</strong> his essay contains an interesting physiologicalspeculation as to the way in which the suggestive ideas may work (p. 67 <strong>of</strong>the reprint). As regards the general phenomenon <strong>of</strong> mental cure itself, Dr.Goddard writes: “In spite <strong>of</strong> the severe criticism we have made <strong>of</strong> reports<strong>of</strong> cure, there still remains a vast amount <strong>of</strong> material, showing a powerfulinfluence <strong>of</strong> the mind in disease. Many cases are <strong>of</strong> diseases that have beendiagnosed and treated by the best physicians <strong>of</strong> the country, or whichprominent hospitals have tried their hand at curing, but without success.People <strong>of</strong> culture and education have been treated by this method withsatisfactory results. Diseases <strong>of</strong> long standing have been ameliorated, andeven cured… . We have traced the mental element through primitive medicineand folk-medicine <strong>of</strong> to-day, patent medicine, and witchcraft. We areconvinced that it is impossible to account for the existence <strong>of</strong> these practices,if they did not cure disease, and that if they cured disease, it musthave been the mental element that was effective. <strong>The</strong> same argument appliesto those modern schools <strong>of</strong> mental therapeutics—Divine Healing92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!