Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...
Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...
Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> PATHFINDERS: THE SECOND YEARtended <strong>to</strong> emphasise the importance of transferable skills, particularly the PRSQs, which theyclaimed were important precisely because they facilitated progression <strong>to</strong> a wide range offurther learning <strong>and</strong> employment. How significant these different perspectives might provein the longer-term is a moot point.341. Within the pathfinder there was some frustration at what was seen as the slow pace ofcollaboration between education <strong>and</strong> the NHS. While this frustration was underst<strong>and</strong>able,our view was that given the complexity, institutional au<strong>to</strong>nomy <strong>and</strong> somewhat differentvalues <strong>and</strong> working practices within what one interviewee called “two massive stateindustries”, within the pathfinder timescale a great deal had been achieved <strong>and</strong> thepartnership had already begun <strong>to</strong> impact upon student experiences through activities such asthose described above.342. However, another interviewee described the partnership between education <strong>and</strong> theNHS as “fragile”. It was argued that it was threatened by performance pressures both withinthe health <strong>and</strong> education systems. However, whilst the partnership could potentially impactpositively on educational performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs by, for example, making courses morerelevant <strong>and</strong> motivating <strong>and</strong> thus raising participation, progression <strong>and</strong> achievement, it wouldnot impact upon the immediate performance indica<strong>to</strong>rs upon which health professionalswould be judged. Their engagement seemed <strong>to</strong> be marginal <strong>to</strong> their central tasks – as alabora<strong>to</strong>ry manager or estates manager, for example - <strong>and</strong> they were taking on their schoolpartnership work in addition <strong>to</strong> their existing responsibilities. It was suggested that unlesssuch work was institutionalised within the NHS, by being written in<strong>to</strong> job descriptions <strong>and</strong>time allowances, for example, the activities might be vulnerable when immediateperformance pressures became particularly acute.105