13.07.2015 Views

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> PATHFINDERS: THE SECOND YEAR127. Finally, in this sub-section we reported in our report on the first year of <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong>Pathfinders that there was:little evidence that pathfinders have given priority <strong>to</strong> preparing for the requirement, <strong>to</strong>be introduced in September 2004, under which it will be a statu<strong>to</strong>ry for all schools <strong>to</strong>provide all students at Key Stage 4 with work-related learning.(Higham et al., 2004)128. This continued <strong>to</strong> be the case in the second year. Some respondents expressed theview that the current m<strong>and</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ry requirements for work-related learning were not sufficientlybroad <strong>to</strong> require schools <strong>to</strong> extend their current provision. However, despite this caveat the<strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> Pathfinders have brought about a significant broadening of the curriculum, largelythrough the development of vocational courses <strong>and</strong> the promotion of work-related learning.Innovative approaches <strong>to</strong> vocational learning129. Having established the extent <strong>to</strong> which the <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> curriculum had been broadened,largely through the expansion of vocational courses, we also explored some of the ways inwhich this vocational learning was practised in the pathfinders. We were particularlyinterested in innovative approaches, especially in the light of the invitation in the 2003/4prospectus <strong>to</strong> Phase Two Pathfinders <strong>to</strong> explore arrange of radical options.130. While there was no hard-<strong>and</strong>-fast distinction, there was in the Phase Two Pathfindersa greater emphasis on innovation <strong>and</strong> the enhancement of curriculum <strong>and</strong> pedagogy than wasevident in the Phase One Pathfinders. Thus the promotion of a series of radical options bythe DfES did influence the character of the proposals, although as we showed (see paragraph20) these were taken up quite selectively by the pathfinders. There were many instances ofinnovative approaches some of which are detailed in the case studies.131. These more innovative approaches, while being responses <strong>to</strong> DfES encouragement,may also have been a product of the timing of the Phase Two Pathfinders. Many of the areasin which the Phase Two Pathfinders were located had already been involved in other <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong>reform initiatives. Thus, in several of the case studies, structures <strong>and</strong> patterns of provisionwere already in place <strong>and</strong> the pathfinders were able <strong>to</strong> focus upon enhancing <strong>and</strong> developing43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!