13.07.2015 Views

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> PATHFINDERS: THE SECOND YEAR176. Several pathfinders were explicit in aiming <strong>to</strong> engage all <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> year olds. Forexample, one coordina<strong>to</strong>r wrote:The original Pathfinder proposal was always intended <strong>to</strong> develop a universalcurriculum model for all studentswhile another stated that:It is an important tenet of this Pathfinder that the <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> phase of education is theindividual career development phase. This applies equally <strong>to</strong> all students, be theyfollowing academic or vocational courses, be they underachievers, high-flyers orsomewhere in between.177. However, the patterns of involvement by different groups of young people were also aproduct of the curriculum provision which was offered. For example, if at <strong>14</strong>-16 the majorityof additional provision was in level 1 courses, these would inevitably tend <strong>to</strong> recruit lowerachieving students, especially where they were set against GCSE courses in school optionsblocks. Alternatively if the focus of provision was on GCSEs in vocational subjects thiswould attract a group of learners who were considered capable of achieving at level 2. In thiscase however, the precise nature of the students recruited might also depend upon how thecourses were placed in school option blocks. For example, if their placement precluded thepossibility of students taking three science subjects or two modern foreign languages thiswould reduce the likelihood of higher achieving students taking the courses.178. This leads on <strong>to</strong> a third set of processes which helped <strong>to</strong> determine the patterns ofinvolvement which emerged. These were concerned with the ways in which the provisionwas perceived by different participants. For example, a number of respondents complainedthat although the activities were aimed at a wide range of students, in practice it had generallybeen easier <strong>to</strong> persuade schools <strong>to</strong> let lower achieving <strong>and</strong> more challenging students engagein pathfinder activities. One coordina<strong>to</strong>r put this point quite bluntly: “Reluctance of someschools <strong>to</strong> target higher ability students for inclusion on the project”. In their report onGCSEs in vocational subjects Ofsted stated that there was the perception in several schoolsthat the courses should be targeted at lower attaining students (Ofsted, 2003a).179. Reluctance <strong>to</strong> participate might also come from students themselves, or their parents,<strong>and</strong> might be related <strong>to</strong> the nature of the activity or its location e.g. if this involved travelling59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!