13.07.2015 Views

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

Collaborative Approaches to 14-19 Provision - Communities and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> PATHFINDERS: THE SECOND YEARcolleges <strong>to</strong> identify <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> progression routes (see case studies for further details on all theseexamples).161. Other developments in the case studies were also strongly focused on promoting <strong>14</strong>-<strong>19</strong> progression. The CG6 in Gateshead had been established with the primary purpose offacilitating progression from 11-16 schools <strong>to</strong> full-time post-16 education. This was achievedthrough making it possible for some students <strong>to</strong> access some of their post-16 learning in their11-16 schools thus encouraging progression <strong>and</strong> easing transition. A similar development,but with a different client group of students was being developed in Southwark with theintroduction of some year 12 provision in four 11-16 schools. This is intended <strong>to</strong> tackle thelow rates of participation post-16 by 16 <strong>and</strong> 17 year olds. It is based on the assumption thatsome students are uncomfortable about making the transition <strong>to</strong> college or training providersat 16. Thus the intention is <strong>to</strong> provide a one-year course in school, which as well asimproving basic <strong>and</strong> vocational skills, will also aim <strong>to</strong> ease progression <strong>to</strong> the next stage atage 17. Similar concerns, although with yet another client group, had prompted thedevelopment of level 2 vocational courses in Coventry schools (see case study). In all thesecases it was intended that students would progress <strong>to</strong> full-time college courses at 17.162. When considering obstacles <strong>to</strong> the development of progression routes coordina<strong>to</strong>rsraised several broad issues – in addition <strong>to</strong> endemic problems of shortage of time <strong>to</strong> do allthat needed <strong>to</strong> be done. The first of these concerned the lack of provision of information inschools with sixth forms about progression routes in<strong>to</strong> colleges <strong>and</strong> work-based learning.This issue has been clearly identified in previous research (Foskett, Dyke & Maringe, 2004)<strong>and</strong> although there was some evidence that the collaborative approaches required bypathfinders has ameliorated its effects, the institutional au<strong>to</strong>nomy which can be exercised byschools meant that these effects were by no means eradicated.163. A second issue which was raised concerned the reliability <strong>and</strong>/or durability of thelabour market information upon which some progression route planning was based. Someparticipants were concerned that aspirations <strong>and</strong> expectations of employment in particularsec<strong>to</strong>rs might be raised but then dashed either because of insufficient capacity or because ofunpredictable changes in labour <strong>and</strong> skills needs within sec<strong>to</strong>rs.53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!