13.07.2015 Views

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Additional Notes on Some Points in St. <strong>Basil</strong>'s Doctrinal <strong>and</strong> Ecclesiastical Position.IX.—Additional Notes on Some Points in St. <strong>Basil</strong>’s Doctrinal <strong>and</strong> EcclesiasticalPosition.It has been claimed with reason that the doctrinal st<strong>and</strong>point of St. <strong>Basil</strong> is identicalwith that of the English Church, with the one exception of the veneration of relics <strong>and</strong> theinvocation of saints. 702In confirmation of this view, the following points may be noted:1. The <strong>Holy</strong> Eucharist. The remarkable passage on the spiritual m<strong>and</strong>ucation of theelements in Letter VIII. is commented on on p. 118. His custom as to frequent communion<strong>and</strong> his opinion as to the reserved sacrament are remarked on on p. 179.A significant passage is to be found in the Moralia, Rule XXI., that participation in theBody <strong>and</strong> Blood of Christ is necessary to eternal life. John vi. 54, is then quoted. That nobenefit is derived by him who comes to communion without consideration of the methodwhereby participation of the Body <strong>and</strong> Blood of Christ is given; <strong>and</strong> that he who receivesunworthily is condemned. On this John vi. 54 <strong>and</strong> 62, <strong>and</strong> 1 Cor. xiii. 27, are quoted. Bywhat method (ποί& 251· λόγῳ) we must eat the Body <strong>and</strong> drink the Blood of the Lord, inremembrance of the Lord’s obedience unto death, that they who live may no longer liveunto themselves, but to Him who died <strong>and</strong> rose again for them. In answer, the quotationsare Luke xxii. 29, 1 Cor. xi. 23, 2 Cor. v. 14, <strong>and</strong> 1 Cor. x. 16.2. Mariolatry. Even Letter CCCLX., which bears obvious marks of spuriousness, <strong>and</strong>of proceeding from a later age, does not go beyond a recognition of the Blessed Virgin asΘεοτόκος, in which the Catholic Church is agreed, <strong>and</strong> a general invocation of apostles,prophets, <strong>and</strong> martyrs, the Virgin not being set above these. The argument of Letter CCLXI.(p. 300) that “if the Godbearing flesh was not ordained to be assumed of the lump of Adam,what need was there of the Blessed Virgin?” seems quite inconsistent with the moderndoctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Of any cultus of the Virgin, St. <strong>Basil</strong>’s writingsshew no trace.3. Relations to the Roman Church.In order to say something under this head, Ceillier, the Benedictine, is driven to suchstraits as to quote the application of the term “Coryphæus” to Damasus in Letter CCXXXIX.Certainly St. <strong>Basil</strong> saw no reason to congratulate the Westerns on their “Coryphæus,” so faras intelligent interest in the East was involved. Fialon 703 sees the position more clearly, sofar as <strong>Basil</strong> is concerned, though he assumes the Councils to have given more authority tothe patriarch of the ancient capital than was in fact conceded. “Si <strong>Basil</strong>e ne va pas, commela majorité du Concile de Constantinople, jusqu’à traiter l’Occident comne étranger; s’il nepretend pas que 1’empire appartienne à l’Orient, parce que l’Orient voit naitre le Soleil, et que702 cf. Dr. Travers Smith, St. <strong>Basil</strong>, p. 125.703 Etude Hist. p. 133.130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!