13.07.2015 Views

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To Amphilochius, concerning the Canons.intelligence. Such women, when they cause death, though the result of their action may notbe what they intended, are nevertheless, on account of their proceedings being magical <strong>and</strong>prohibited, to be reckoned among intentional homicides. Women also who administerdrugs to cause abortion, as well as those who take poisons to destroy unborn children, aremurderesses. So much on this subject.IX. The sentence of the Lord that it is unlawful to withdraw from wedlock, save on accountof fornication, 2636 applies, according to the argument, to men <strong>and</strong> women alike.Custom, however, does not so obtain. Yet, in relation with women, very strict expressionsare to be found; as, for instance, the words of the apostle “He which is joined to a harlot isone body” 2637 <strong>and</strong> of Jeremiah, If a wife “become another man’s shall he return unto heragain? shall not that l<strong>and</strong> be greatly polluted?” 2638 And again, “He that hath an adulteressis a fool <strong>and</strong> impious.” 2639 Yet custom ordains that men who commit adultery <strong>and</strong> are infornication be retained by their wives. Consequently I do not know if the woman who liveswith the man who has been dismissed can properly be called an adulteress; the charge inthis case attaches to the woman who has put away her husb<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> depends upon the causefor which she withdrew from wedlock. 2640 In the case of her being beaten, <strong>and</strong> refusing tosubmit, it would be better for her to endure than to be separated from her husb<strong>and</strong>; in thecase of her objecting to pecuniary loss, even here she would not have sufficient ground. Ifher reason is his living in fornication we do not find this in the custom of the church; butfrom an unbelieving husb<strong>and</strong> a wife is comm<strong>and</strong>ed not to depart, but to remain, on accountof the uncertainty of the issue. “For what knowest thou, O wife, whether thou shalt savethy husb<strong>and</strong>?” 2641 Here then the wife, if she leaves her husb<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> goes to another, is anadulteress. But the man who has been ab<strong>and</strong>oned is pardonable, <strong>and</strong> the woman who liveswith such a man is not condemned. But if the man who has deserted his wife goes to another,2272636 Matt. v. 32.2637 1 Cor. vi. 16.2638 Jer. iii. 1.2639 Prov. xviii. 22, LXX.2640 The Ben. note is, Sequitur in hoc canone <strong>Basil</strong>ius Romanas leges, quas tamen fatetur cum evangelio minusconsentire. Lex Constantini jubet in repudio mittendo a femina hæc sola crimina inquiri, si homicidam, velmedicamentarium, vel sepulcrorum dissolutorem maritum suum esse probaverit. At eadem lege viris conceditur,ut adulteras uxores dimittant. Aliud discrimen hoc in canone uxores inter et maritos ponitur, quod uxor injustedimissa, si ab alia ducatur, adulterii notam non effugiat; dimissus autem injuste maritus nec adulter sit, si aliamducat, nec quæ ab eo ducitur, adultera. Cæterum <strong>Basil</strong>ius ante episcopatum eodem jure uxorem ac maritum essecensebat. Nam in Moral. reg. 73statuit virum ab uxore, aut uxorem a viro non debere separari, nisi quis deprehendaturin adulterio. Utrique pariter interdicit novis nuptiis, sive repudient, sive repudientur.2641 1 Cor. vii. 16.656

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!