13.07.2015 Views

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works - Holy Bible Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To Amphilochius, concerning the Canons.itation, let them admit the penalty of fornication. Let them be allowed to live together, lesta worse thing happen.XXVII. As to the priest ignorantly involved in an illegal marriage, 2706 I have made thefitting regulation, that he may hold his seat, but must abstain from other functions. Forsuch a case pardon is enough. It is unreasonable that the man who has to treat his ownwounds should be blessing another, for benediction is the imparting of holiness. How canhe who through his fault, committed in ignorance, is without holiness, impart it to another?Let him bless neither in public nor in private, nor distribute the body of Christ to others,nor perform any other sacred function, but, content with his seat of honour, let him beseechthe Lord with weeping, that his sin, committed in ignorance, may be forgiven.XXVIII. It has seemed to me ridiculous that any one should make a vow to abstainfrom swine’s flesh. Be so good as to teach men to abstain from foolish vows <strong>and</strong> promises.Represent the use to be quite indifferent. No creature of God, received with thanksgiving,is to be rejected. 2707 The vow is ridiculous; the abstinence unnecessary.XXIX. It is especially desirable that attention should be given to the case of persons inpower who threaten on oath to do some hurt to those under their authority. The remedyis twofold. In the first place, let them be taught not to take oaths at r<strong>and</strong>om: secondly, notto persist in their wicked determinations. Any one who is arrested in the design of fulfillingan oath to injure another ought to shew repentance for the rashness of his oath, <strong>and</strong> mustnot confirm his wickedness under the pretext of piety. Herod was none the better for fulfillinghis oath, when, of course only to save himself from perjury, he became the prophet’s murderer.2708 Swearing is absolutely forbidden, 2709 <strong>and</strong> it is only reasonable that the oath whichtends to evil should be condemned. The swearer must therefore change his mind, <strong>and</strong> notpersist in confirming his impiety. Consider the absurdity of the thing a little further. Supposea man to swear that he will put his brother’s eyes out: is it well for him to carry his oathinto action? Or to commit murder? or to break any other comm<strong>and</strong>ment? “I have sworn,<strong>and</strong> I will perform it,” 2710 not to sin, but to “keep thy righteous judgments.” It is no lessour duty to undo <strong>and</strong> destroy sin, than it is to confirm the comm<strong>and</strong>ment by immutablecounsels.XXX. As to those guilty of abduction we have no ancient rule, but I have expressed myown judgment. The period is three years; 2711 the culprits <strong>and</strong> their accomplices to be ex-2392706 “᾽Αθέσμῳ γάμῳ.” Illicitas nuptias.2707 1 Tim. iv. 4.2708 Matt. xiv. 10.2709 Matt. v. 34.2710 Ps. cxix. 106.2711 The Ben. Ed. point out that in Canon xxii. four years is the allotted period, as in the case of fornicators.682

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!