13.07.2015 Views

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Boca</strong> <strong>Raton</strong> Regulatory Information SummaryTotal Maximum Daily Load Allocation ProgramWBIDTable 4Group 3 Verified Impaired Waters in the Palm Beach Coast / Lake Worth Lagoon Basin<strong>Plan</strong>ningUnit Waterbody Parameters PriorityProjected Yearfor TMDL<strong>Development</strong>Concentration3226F Intracoastal ICCW AB POMPANO COPPER MEDIUM 2010 > 3.7 mg/L3226F2 Intracoastal LAKE WORTH LAGOON SOUTH SEG COPPER MEDIUM 2010 > 3.7 mg/L8096B Intracoastal HILLSBORO INLET PARK NUTRIENTS MEDIUM 2010 Median TN3233 L-8 L-8 DISSOLVED HIGH 20053262D C-15 E-3 CANAL DISSOLVED MEDIUM 2010 < 5.0 mg/L3245 C-51 C-51 DISSOLVED MEDIUM 2010 < 5.0 mg/LHillsboro3264D Canal E-4 CANAL NUTRIENTS MEDIUM 2010 Median TN3242A C-17 PB STATIONS/D CANALS DISSOLVED MEDIUM 2010 < 5.0 mg/L3245B C-51 LAKE CLARKE DISSOLVED MEDIUM 2010 < 5.0 mg/L3262A C-15 LAKE IDA NUTRIENTS MEDIUM 2010 Median TNA map <strong>of</strong> Palm Beach County showing the MS4 NPDES watershed delineations and the boundaries <strong>of</strong> theGroup 3 Impaired Waters from the Verified List (per GIS coverage provided on the FDEP website datedMay 17, 2007 and downloaded on August 1, 2007) is provided as Figure 2.Assessments <strong>of</strong> incoming water quality data to verify or dismiss findings <strong>of</strong> impairment are ongoing forGroup 3 waters. The Verified List is periodically revised to reflect changes to the status <strong>of</strong> water bodiesbased on new modeling analyses as FDEP continues to evaluate additional information. As more <strong>of</strong> theseassessments will occur prior to the 2010 TMDL development, this list <strong>of</strong> impaired waters is subject to change.Additional InformationRule 62-303, F.A.C also outlines procedures for removal <strong>of</strong> a waterbody from the <strong>Plan</strong>ning or VerifiedLists, and requirements for any scientific evidence used to do so. These requirements vary among thecategories <strong>of</strong> assessment listed above, and are not necessarily the same for removal <strong>of</strong> a segment fromeither the <strong>Plan</strong>ning or Verified List. Some <strong>of</strong> the major reasons given for delisting (or not verifying) awaterbody segment are:ooooooInsufficient dataImproperly sampled, analyzed, or reported data valuesChanges in FDEP’s program or procedure which, following a reassessment, lead tothe conclusion that the waterbody is not impairedSubsequent statistical assessments <strong>of</strong> data demonstrating that the minimumexceedence threshold for listing is no longer being metSignificant scientific evidence that the designated use is being metConstruction or installation <strong>of</strong> BMPs or other pollution reduction technologies provides areasonable assurance that the designated use will be met or that the minimum exceedencethreshold for listing will not be met, as accepted by FDEPL:\boca\bocaswmp\A6016.02\Final Task 2 Report - 1-07-08\r01acjh.docPage 21MOCK•ROOS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!