13.07.2015 Views

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

Master Plan Development - City of Boca Raton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Boca</strong> <strong>Raton</strong> Stormwater Management <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Part I – Task 3 ReportE. Meetings with Advisory Boards<strong>City</strong> Staff contacted the Environmental, Financial and Marine advisory boards to schedule meetings topresent the draft stormwater management master plan (including the conceptual improvement projects).The Environmental Advisory Board decided not to conduct a meeting at this time. The FinancialAdvisory Board also made the decision that at this stage, there was no need to review the plan with them.A meeting with the Marine Advisory Board was held on March 5, 2008. A presentation <strong>of</strong> the draftstormwater management master plan was made, questions were answered, and there was discussionregarding water quality improvement programs by the <strong>City</strong>.F. Prioritization <strong>of</strong> Proposed ProjectsOne <strong>of</strong> the tasks requested by the <strong>City</strong> was the prioritization <strong>of</strong> the proposed conceptual projects. In orderto accomplish this, a criteria list and associated scoring system was developed. The system wasdeveloped based on methods and systems created by other entities around the country (primarilymunicipalities) that carried out the same task <strong>of</strong> ranking planned stormwater improvement projects. Thescoring system was reviewed with <strong>City</strong> staff and modified as requested to best meet the <strong>City</strong>’s needs.The <strong>City</strong> will use the prioritized conceptual projects list in conjunction with the conceptual costestimates, and an understanding <strong>of</strong> the funding and resources available, to determine an implementationschedule for the conceptual projects.Each criterion in the list was assigned a weight from 1 to 5, based on its relative importance to the othercriteria on the list. The weight value factors into the total score that each project receives.Within each criterion, possible descriptions for existing conditions (pre-improvement) were listed andassigned a relative value from 1 to 10, based on relative significance to the other descriptions. Thecriteria and scoring values are presented in the following table:L:\boca\bocaswmp\A6016.03\rp02accm.docPage 59MOCK•ROOS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!