19.09.2015 Views

BRIDGE REPAIR/REHABILITATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

Bridge Repair_Rehabilitation Feasibility Study - Town to Chatham

Bridge Repair_Rehabilitation Feasibility Study - Town to Chatham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Based on the 1997 load rating analysis, all members of the bridge have capacities in excess of<br />

Operating Level capacities (see Appendix C.) As such, load restrictions and weight posting were<br />

previously waived. Although the bridge does not currently require load restrictions, the load<br />

rating analyses revealed that two elements of the bridge have load carrying capacities less than<br />

the Inventory Level capacities. These elements are the shear capacity of the bascule span timber<br />

stringers and the shear capacity of the Bent 7A timber bent cap that supports the bascule span.<br />

Load capacities less than the Inventory Level capacities indicate that the structural member may<br />

not have adequate capacity to carry current loading indefinitely and that degradation of the<br />

elements under loading is eventually expected. Furthermore, in accordance with FHWA<br />

guidelines, if the existing bridge was to remain and was rehabilitated, a design exception would<br />

need to be granted to allow the members with substandard Inventory Level capacity to remain.<br />

Otherwise the substandard members would need to be strengthened or replaced with stronger<br />

members. According to the 2010 Structures Inspection Field Report, the condition of the bridge<br />

has not changed sufficiently to warrant a new load rating evaluation.<br />

4.1.4 Functional Evaluation and Roadway Safety<br />

The existing bridge contains geometry that<br />

is considered substandard (i.e. the<br />

geometry does not meet current design<br />

standards.) Specifically, the narrow 24’-0”<br />

clear roadway width between curbs for<br />

two travel lanes is considered substandard.<br />

Because of the geometry, the bridge has a<br />

Deck Geometry Rating of 2 (Intolerable<br />

with a High Priority of Replacement) and<br />

as such, the bridge qualifies as<br />

“Functionally Obsolete”. In accordance<br />

with FHWA guidelines, as the bridge is<br />

also currently classified as “Structurally<br />

Deficient” it cannot also be classified as<br />

“Functionally Obsolete”. Bridges that<br />

qualify as both “Structurally Deficient”<br />

and “Functionally Obsolete” are classified<br />

as “Structurally Deficient”. If sufficient<br />

improvements were made to the deficient<br />

structural members without corresponding<br />

improvements to the geometric features,<br />

the existing bridge would then be<br />

classified as “Functionally Obsolete”.<br />

Photo 3 - Approach Sidewalk and Guardrails<br />

The existing bridge does not contain traffic railings that are crash tested in accordance with<br />

NCHRP 350 as required by current design standards. Low-level curbs, such as the existing 1’-1”<br />

high timber curbs, have a history of causing errant vehicles that strike the curb to lose control<br />

and rollover. The traffic railings are required to meet Test Level 2 (TL-2) crash testing criteria<br />

as a minimum, which are appropriate for use on local collector roads, with favorable site<br />

Repair/Rehab. Feasibility Study March 10, 2011<br />

Bridge No. C-07-001 (437) 12 Final Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!