BRIDGE REPAIR/REHABILITATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
Bridge Repair_Rehabilitation Feasibility Study - Town to Chatham
Bridge Repair_Rehabilitation Feasibility Study - Town to Chatham
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.2.2 Deck<br />
NBIS Condition Rating: 5 (Fair)<br />
Condition Description: The timber structural deck planks, which include the sidewalk areas,<br />
exhibit visual evidence of moisture retention and decay with staining and mildew on the<br />
underside between the timber stringers. Much of the preservative chemicals in the deck planks<br />
appear to have leeched from the timber and thus do not provide significant protection from<br />
decay. Although, the top surface of the structural deck beneath the timber wearing surface and<br />
the underside of the deck above the stringers is not accessible for visual inspection, the timber<br />
structural deck has experienced structural failure at one location in Span 4, which indicates that<br />
deterioration of the structural deck may be more significant than the visual evidence reveals.<br />
As described above for the timber wearing surface, moisture enters the small gaps between the<br />
timber wearing surface planks and is retained between the top of the structural deck and<br />
underside of the wearing surface, especially where the nails for the wearing surface planks have<br />
loosened. The underside of the deck exhibits signs of moisture retention and decay in varying<br />
severity throughout. Open nail holes in the top of the structural deck from attachment of timber<br />
wearing surface planks previously replaced, as well as splits and checks, provide opportunities<br />
for moisture and fungal spores to enter the structural deck planks to a depth beyond the<br />
preservatives, which promotes decay. As the top surface of the structural deck beneath the<br />
wearing surface and the underside of the structural deck above the stringers is not visible, it is<br />
not possible to visually confirm the condition of these areas. However, based on the observed<br />
condition of the accessible surfaces, it is likely that the condition of the non-visible surfaces is<br />
likely to be more severe due to the greater potential for retained moisture.<br />
The top surface of the structural deck in the sidewalks is visible and exhibits moderate<br />
deterioration with early signs of decay and significant splits and checks throughout. Similar to<br />
the timber wearing surface, the splits and checks in the top (horizontal surface) of the wood<br />
contribute to increased water absorption by providing easier access of the moisture to enter<br />
grains of the wood. The increased water absorption results in greater volumetric expansion of<br />
the wood when it is wet and increased shrinkage of the wood as it dries. The increased shrinkage<br />
promotes growth in the number and size of splits and checks in the wood, which further<br />
increases moisture absorption and provides an avenue for fungal spores to enter the wood. The<br />
significant volumetric change in the wood also acts to work nails loose. Increased water<br />
absorption also promotes decay by providing the source of moisture required by fungi that feed<br />
on the wood. Larger splits and checks will retain a greater amount of moisture.<br />
The ends of the timber structural deck planks exhibit early signs of decay. The cut ends of the<br />
structural deck are not sealed, and although the cut ends are not located where water typically<br />
ponds, water on the sidewalks drains over the cut ends as it drains through the openings in the<br />
pedestrian railing curbs, which permits water to absorb into the ends of the planks. Water<br />
absorption in the cut ends of the structural planks promotes decay near the ends of the planks.<br />
Based on the above conditions, it is expected that the deterioration and decay of the timber<br />
structural deck will continue and may accelerate.<br />
Repair/Rehab. Feasibility Study March 10, 2011<br />
Bridge No. C-07-001 (437) 16 Final Report