26.09.2015 Views

PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Legal Services<br />

experience. As a result, disputes will be forthcoming. While many of them will<br />

be addressed through private arbitration, the volume of litigation around these<br />

sorts of deals will expand considerably as ownership of IP from the technology<br />

transactions and joint ventures will need to be unpacked. In the longer term<br />

(4–5 years), there will be a greater need for “technical” IP mediation capability,<br />

such as with patents, technical trade secrets, and software litigation.<br />

Chatterjee participated in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)/Intellectual<br />

Property Rights (IPR) seminar as part of a delegation brought to India by the San<br />

Francisco-based <strong>Institute</strong> for the Study and Development of Legal Systems<br />

(ISDLS). Since 1996, the <strong>Institute</strong>, founded and led by attorney and law professor Stephen Mayo,<br />

has collaborated with the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, and bar associations to<br />

modernize India’s legal system. Its specific mission, at the invitation of India’s judiciary, has been<br />

to design ADR and judicial case management processes that would reduce court backlogs overall<br />

and, in particular, help expedite IPR cases through the High Courts.<br />

ISDLS, working with legal study groups of Supreme Court and High Court judges and attorneys<br />

created by then Chief Justice of India A.M. Ahmadi, helped develop reports and recommendations<br />

to the Indian Law Commission (ILC). Based on that information, the ILC prepared a draft<br />

law which was passed by Parliament in 1999 but was then tied up for three years in a constitutional<br />

appeal by an Indian bar association.<br />

In 2002, ISDLS participated in the exchange when a Supreme Court of India delegation<br />

was hosted in Washington, D.C. by U.S. Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O’Connor<br />

and Stephen Breyer. In 2003, ISDLS and the Law Commission co-hosted a national ADR<br />

conference in India, and in 2005, the <strong>Institute</strong> launched two pilot ADR projects in the Delhi<br />

district courts that produced settlement rates of 67% and resolved some 1,500 cases. In 2006, the<br />

Delhi pilot projects were made permanent. <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong> attorneys Victor Schachter, a partner with<br />

Fenwick & West LLP in Mountain View, and Jeffrey Banchero, a partner with Kastner<br />

Banchero LLP in San Francisco, helped direct the second six-month pilot mediation project.<br />

<strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong> Law Firms Active in India (Partial List)<br />

The Chugh Firm<br />

Cooley Godward<br />

Fenwick & West LLP<br />

Foley & Lardner LLP<br />

Greenberg Traurig LLP<br />

Jones Day<br />

Latham & Watkins LLP<br />

Mayer Brown LLP<br />

Nishith Desai Associates<br />

Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP<br />

Perkins Coie LLP<br />

Pillsbury Winthrop LLP<br />

Ropers Majinski Kohn and Bentley PC<br />

Shearman & Sterling LLP<br />

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP<br />

White & Case LLP<br />

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!