PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Global Reach<br />
The Ministry of Power reports a 10% overall deficit between electricity capacity and consumption,<br />
rising to as much as 15% during peak periods. If India is to meet its 2005 National Electricity<br />
Policy goal of universal electricity access by 2012, the installed base will need to grow to 400,000<br />
megawatts. The government forecasts that coal, oil, and gas will generate 75% of this power,<br />
though new consideration is being given to alternative hydroelectric, nuclear, and renewable fuels.<br />
McKinsey estimates the total investment cost at about $225 billion, with the public sector portion<br />
to include 102,000 megawatts of generation capacity, 60,000 kilometers (37,300 miles) of<br />
extra high voltage transmission lines, and an increase in interregional power transfer capacity<br />
from 9,500 to 37,000 megawatts. Government attempts to encourage private development of<br />
generating capacity have met with only limited success: investors have been concerned regarding<br />
the financial health of the state electricity boards, which are the exclusive buyers of power.<br />
A 2008 Parliamentary report found that the government’s efforts to address these issues are<br />
falling short. In the five years leading up to March 2007, India added only 21,080 megawatts of<br />
generation capacity, half the official target. Peak load deficits are expected to continue through<br />
2012, and even after that infrastructure bottlenecks are likely to produce coal and gas supply<br />
interruptions and power outages.<br />
Unscheduled outages, voltage fluctuations, and peak-period utility shutdowns when customers<br />
exceed contracted limits—called load shedding—have indirect cost impacts involving: overdesigned<br />
motors; voltage stabilizers connected to expensive equipment; backup diesel generators;<br />
chargeable battery “inverters” that store utility power; replacement of burnt out transformers,<br />
cables, motors, compressors and pumps; and idled production lines and employees. They also<br />
deter potential investors in new industrial capacity.<br />
Studies by the Planning Commission, the Brookings Institution, McKinsey, the Center for<br />
Strategic and International Studies, International Resources Group, and others all offer broadly<br />
similar prescriptions for addressing India’s power generation difficulties in the shorter term:<br />
• Encourage increased foreign investment in both generation and transmission infrastructure.<br />
• Complete 2003 reforms that centralize transmission grid, plant construction, and power trading,<br />
so that utilities compete on price and service over a single, rationalized infrastructure.<br />
• Negotiate agreements with Nepal to develop 42,000 megawatts of accessible surplus<br />
hydro power and connect to a regional electricity grid serving Bangladesh, Bhutan, India,<br />
and Nepal.<br />
• Improve billing and collection processes, operating efficiencies, and protections against<br />
electricity theft.<br />
• End pricing structures under which industrial, commercial and large household users<br />
subsidize unmetered and discount pricing for farmers and the poor.<br />
• End caps on retail energy prices that subsidize farmers and consumers at the expense of<br />
state utilities.<br />
184