PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
PDF: 2962 pages, 5.2 MB - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Global Reach<br />
Faced with rising costs, congestion, and attrition and job-hopping in their workforce, Indian and<br />
global IT firms that were once based predominantly in Bangalore and the National Capital<br />
Region (New Delhi, Gurgaon and Noida) are now increasingly looking to Tier 2 and 3 cities such<br />
as Hyderabad, Chennai, Chandigarh, Jaipur, Pune, and Kolkata for expansion. Major IT firms are<br />
also expanding their global presence by establishing service and employment centers to serve<br />
regional markets outside India. Locally based software development and customer support centers<br />
now operate in the U.S., China, Southeast Asia, Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle<br />
East, Mexico, Canada, and Brazil.<br />
In 2007, five of India’s seven leading IT companies had a presence in China, often with multiple<br />
locations. Geographic expansion is also happening through acquisitions. While employees at<br />
these overseas sites are largely Indian, efforts are underway to increase local hires. In the United<br />
States, TCS has a facility in Ohio employing 1,000 professionals. Wipro employs more than<br />
8,000 professionals across the U.S., principally in locations such as Austin and Atlanta with high<br />
concentrations of educational institutions and trained workers.<br />
The flow of talent has not been exclusively one-way: when a shortage of more highly-skilled<br />
R&D center workers in India became apparent in 2006, large Indian firms began recruiting from<br />
U.S. universities, first placing graduates in India and then eventually returning them to the U.S. in<br />
positions starting in the $50–60,000 annual salary range. To date, the number of such recruits<br />
does not appear to be large, and retention levels are unclear.<br />
To H-1B or Not to H-1B<br />
A debate over U.S. visa policy began in the early years of this<br />
decade, extending from Washington, D.C. to Silicon Valley to<br />
India, with no resolution in sight.<br />
Until the early 1990s, there was no cap on the number of H-1B<br />
visas issued to foreign workers with special skills admitted to the<br />
U.S. to work for sponsoring companies or organizations. In 1991,<br />
however, Congress set a cap of 65,000 visas. As the U.S. tech<br />
industry grew during the 1990s and companies increased their<br />
reliance on foreign engineers and programmers, the cap was<br />
raised in 1997 and 1998. Congress approved temporary increases<br />
to 115,000 visas in 1999–2000 and to 165,000 in 2001–03.<br />
The higher caps expired in 2004, and with the technology sector<br />
in a post dot-com slump, they were not renewed. The current<br />
65,000-visa cap has two exceptions: an additional 20,000 visas are<br />
reserved for master’s and doctoral graduates of U.S. universities,<br />
and U.S. universities and academic research institutions are exempt<br />
altogether from the cap.<br />
124