08.03.2016 Views

Earning Power

1p4Cz9a

1p4Cz9a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C—Sampling Methodology<br />

PMI’s <strong>Earning</strong> <strong>Power</strong>: Project Management Salary Survey, Ninth Edition, was sent to a stratified sampling of customers<br />

from 34 different countries. Countries included in the sampling were selected based on two factors: concentration of<br />

PMI members within a given country and the desire to represent all regions of the globe.<br />

The survey invitation was sent via an email that included a link to the web-based survey. Using a web-based survey<br />

benefited the research in several ways, including the ability to survey a large number of respondents at a relatively low<br />

cost (as compared to other data collection methods), a condensed data collection time period and a fairly high<br />

response rate.<br />

PMI contracted with a third-party market research vendor, Quantum Performance Solutions (QPS), for this project. QPS<br />

used its PeriscopeIQ web survey technology platform (www.periscopeiq.com) to conduct this research. QPS is a global<br />

strategy consulting and market research firm with a focus on scientific rigor and research-based methodologies. The<br />

salary survey was conducted according to QPS's best compensation survey practices, including confidentiality of<br />

individual responses.<br />

The first email invitation to the web-based survey was sent to 209,834 professionals on 4 March 2015. Non-responders<br />

were sent a total of three reminder emails throughout the four-week field period, which ended on 6 April 2015. Data<br />

collection for the survey closed with a total of 36,501 completed surveys, yielding a response rate of 17%.<br />

The data collected were run through extensive quality checks by QPS, resulting in the elimination of 10,154 cases<br />

based on the following criteria:<br />

Reason<br />

Number deleted<br />

Not full-time 2,693<br />

Selected “poor fit” for job position 759<br />

Selected undefined country 545<br />

Analyzed to be an anomaly 520<br />

Analyzed to be an outlier or violated other best<br />

2,531<br />

compensation practice principles<br />

Excluded job titles 3,106<br />

As shown in the table above, 759 respondents were eliminated from the data because they noted that the position descriptions<br />

provided did not adequately represent their current job responsibilities. These 759 respondents represent only 2.1% of the total<br />

respondent population, which indicates that the position descriptions provided in the survey are fairly accurate and widely<br />

used.<br />

As a result of this data cleaning process, a total of 26,347 respondents were included in the full report.<br />

Due to the fact that a stratified sampling methodology was used rather than a random sampling, data are not reported<br />

in aggregate form (all countries combined together) in this report. Therefore, we have not calculated an overall<br />

sample error for the entire sample, but have instead included sample error estimates for each country in the table<br />

below.<br />

<strong>Earning</strong> <strong>Power</strong>: Project Management Salary Survey, Ninth Edition<br />

363

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!