08.07.2016 Views

Shamans, Supernaturals & Animal Spirits: Mythic Figures From the Ancient Andes

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

146<br />

Fragment from <strong>the</strong> Shoulder of a Tunic<br />

A Male and Female Pair of Condor Staff-Bearers<br />

Wari culture<br />

AD 600-900<br />

Camelid wool; interlocking tapestry weave<br />

19" x 5½"<br />

The tendency toward ever-increasing abstraction in Wari<br />

textile art was a collective phenomenon, surely driven<br />

as much by individual artistry as by <strong>the</strong> imposition of an<br />

official aes<strong>the</strong>tic. Certainly, local styles and <strong>the</strong>mes might<br />

have influenced <strong>the</strong> development of Wari design. That aspect<br />

might be better understood if it were possible to determine<br />

<strong>the</strong> geographic location of various weaving workshops, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

associating stylistic nuances and innovations with distinct<br />

regions (north/south or coast/highlands).<br />

In this case, <strong>the</strong> compressed rectilinearity and complexity<br />

of <strong>the</strong> image may not solely reflect <strong>the</strong> band’s proximity to<br />

<strong>the</strong> outer sides of <strong>the</strong> tunic, but also suggests an intensified<br />

approach to figural deconstruction and distortion. The play of<br />

elongated elements on both <strong>the</strong> vertical and horizontal axes is<br />

especially pronounced.<br />

Without recourse to <strong>the</strong> overall composition and to <strong>the</strong><br />

matching parallel bands of design, <strong>the</strong> alternating diagrammatic<br />

figures are best decoded through comparison with related<br />

iconography. Two avian staff-bearers alternate in <strong>the</strong> sequence,<br />

switching back and forth in direction, and expanding or<br />

contracting according to typical Wari canons. The pattern<br />

mosaic obscures a subtle differentiation of attribute and<br />

geometry in each image. 1<br />

The most significant distinction is that one of <strong>the</strong> pair<br />

(bottom) displays a large knob on its beak, which apparently<br />

alludes to <strong>the</strong> comb or caruncle of <strong>the</strong> male condor, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r (center) does not, just like <strong>the</strong> female of <strong>the</strong> species.<br />

The distinctive shape of this beak indicates that <strong>the</strong> feature is<br />

deliberate, and that its omission on <strong>the</strong> second figure is not due<br />

to a design constriction. The duality suggests a male and female<br />

couple, which is a novel variant on <strong>the</strong> staffbearer <strong>the</strong>me. (Such<br />

gendered pairs are common among representations of songbirds<br />

and hummingbirds in Early Nasca embroidery. 2 )<br />

This dualistic opposition is carried through in terms of form<br />

and motif. The wing tips, talons, and headdress of <strong>the</strong> male<br />

bird are defined with curving lines. In <strong>the</strong> female, those traits<br />

are demarcated with straight lines; in fact, her feet and hands<br />

are humanlike. The small animal heads appended to <strong>the</strong> edges<br />

of <strong>the</strong> wings and crowns are also varied: one is catlike, <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r has an exaggerated black-and-white beak, like that of<br />

<strong>the</strong> macaw.<br />

1 The third partial figure seen at <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> band reflects <strong>the</strong> change in direction<br />

that occurred at <strong>the</strong> shoulder line of <strong>the</strong> tunic.<br />

2 Mary Frame, “Motion Pictures: Symmetry as Animator, Classifier, and Syntax in <strong>the</strong><br />

Nasca Embroideries of Peru,” in Symmetry Comes of Age: The Role of Pattern in Culture,<br />

ed. Dorothy Washburn and Donald Crowe (2004): 133-176.<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!