Materials for engineering, 3rd Edition - (Malestrom)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
110<br />
<strong>Materials</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>engineering</strong><br />
features include tool life, production rate, surface finish of component, chip<br />
<strong>for</strong>m and ease of swarf removal. Various elements are added to steel in order<br />
to improve the machinability, of which the most important are sulphur<br />
and lead.<br />
Low-carbon free cutting steels are employed <strong>for</strong> components whose<br />
mechanical property requirements are minimal and which are mass produced<br />
at high machining rates. Sulphur contents in the range 0.25–0.35% are typical<br />
and sufficient manganese is also added to ensure that all the sulphur is<br />
present as MnS rather than FeS (which causes cracking during hot working).<br />
The MnS inclusions de<strong>for</strong>m plastically and promote chip <strong>for</strong>mation and they<br />
also <strong>for</strong>m a protective deposit on the tool, resulting in reduced cutting <strong>for</strong>ces<br />
and reduction in the tool wear rate. Substantial further improvements in<br />
machinability are obtained by the addition of ~0.25% lead to such steels.<br />
Machinable low-alloy steels are often based on the more costly lead additions<br />
rather than sulphur, since a high level of toughness and ductility may be<br />
required in the transverse direction in (<strong>for</strong> example) high-strength automotive<br />
transmission components. Re-sulphurized steels tend to exhibit greater<br />
anisotropy of mechanical properties.<br />
Stainless steels<br />
With the addition of about 12% Cr, steels exhibit good resistance to atmospheric<br />
corrosion and these stainless steels owe their passivity to the presence of a<br />
thin protective film of Cr 2 O 3 . They are used because of this corrosion and<br />
oxidation resistance, as well as their pleasing appearance. Because of the<br />
number of elements they contain, their microstructure cannot be simply<br />
represented on the simple phase diagrams we have considered, but they are<br />
normally classified according to their crystal structure as ferritic, martensitic,<br />
austenitic and duplex stainless steels. The alloying elements present can be<br />
classified as ferrite stabilizers, which tend to promote the <strong>for</strong>mation of the<br />
bcc α-phase, or as austenite stabilizers, which tend to promote the facecentred<br />
cubic (fcc) γ-phase. In predicting the room temperature microstructure<br />
of stainless steels, there<strong>for</strong>e, the balance between the ferrite and austenite<br />
<strong>for</strong>mers has to be considered. An empirical and approximate approach to this<br />
question can be made by means of the Schaeffler diagram, which has been<br />
modified by H. Schneider (Foundry Trade J. 108, 562, 1960) illustrated in<br />
Fig. 3.27. This indicates the structures produced after rapid cooling from<br />
1050°C; the axes are the chromium equivalent and the nickel equivalent. The<br />
<strong>for</strong>mer indicates the proportion of elements (expressed as weight percentage)<br />
that behave like chromium in promoting ferrite according to:<br />
Cr equivalent = Cr + 2Si + 1.5Mo + 5V + 5.5Al + 1.75Nb<br />
+ 1.5Ti + 0.75W