Materials for engineering, 3rd Edition - (Malestrom)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
194<br />
<strong>Materials</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>engineering</strong><br />
runs at right-angles in successive layers. For indoor use, urea <strong>for</strong>maldehyde<br />
(UF) is employed, whereas marine ply uses phenol <strong>for</strong>maldehyde (PF) as the<br />
adhesive.<br />
Chipboard is <strong>for</strong>med by the compression moulding of wood chips bonded<br />
with about 10% UF. The material is significantly cheaper than plywood, but<br />
its properties are somewhat inferior.<br />
Hardboard is made from wood chips which have been separated under<br />
pressurized steam into fibres. A mat of these fibres is then hot pressed with<br />
UF into a board with one smooth glossy surface and one textured surface. It<br />
is a cheaper option than plywood where strength is not required, but because<br />
it absorbs water, hardboard cannot be used outside.<br />
Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) is a type of hardboard which is made<br />
from wood fibres glued with UF under heat and pressure: it is dense, flat,<br />
stiff and has no knots and is easily machined. Traditional woodwork joints<br />
may even be cut. Because it is made up of fine particles it does not have an<br />
identifiable grain and it can be painted to produce a smooth surface.<br />
6.4 Modelling composite behaviour<br />
A number of composite models have been developed with the aim of predicting<br />
the mechanical properties of composites from a knowledge of those of the<br />
constituent phases (matrix and rein<strong>for</strong>cement). We will consider some of the<br />
simpler models below.<br />
6.4.1 Stiffness<br />
The elastic behaviour of composite materials can be modelled most readily<br />
if simplifying assumptions are made. One such simplification is to assume<br />
that the two components have identical Poisson ratios. It is also commonly<br />
assumed either that the elastic strain is uni<strong>for</strong>m throughout the composite,<br />
which implies differences in stress distribution, or that the elastic stress field<br />
is uni<strong>for</strong>m, implying variations in local strain.<br />
Assuming uni<strong>for</strong>m strain within the composite: Consider a composite<br />
material consisting of two phases, 1 and 2, which possess a similar Poisson<br />
ratio but differing Young’s moduli of values E 1 and E 2 . Let us assume that,<br />
when the material is elastically distorted, the macroscopic stress and strain<br />
are reproduced in a typical unit volume which consists of a single particle of<br />
material 2 in a cube of matrix material 1. Assuming that the cube is loaded<br />
across two opposite faces by a <strong>for</strong>ce F (Fig. 6.4) and considering a crosssection<br />
of the composite of thickness dx at a distance x from an end face,<br />
which intersects an area A 1 of matrix and an area A 2 of the dispersed material,<br />
if the strain (ε) is uni<strong>for</strong>m within this element, we can write the normal stress<br />
on area A 1 as E 1 ε and that on area A 2 as E 2 ε.