03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROBLEM FOR SELF-STUDY 325<br />

1. Compute the budgeted fixed manufacturing cost per unit in 2012, 2013, and 2014.<br />

2. Explain the difference between absorption-costing operating income and variablecosting<br />

operating income in 2012, 2013, and 2014, focusing on fixed manufacturing<br />

costs in beginning and ending inventory.<br />

3. Why are these differences smaller than the differences in Exhibit 9-2?<br />

4. Assume the same preceding information, except that for 2012, the master-budget<br />

capacity utilization is 10,000 units instead of 8,000. How would Stassen’s absorptioncosting<br />

income for 2012 differ from the $1,500,000 shown previously? Show<br />

your computations.<br />

Required<br />

Solution<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

Budgeted fixed<br />

manufacturing<br />

cost per unit<br />

Absorption-costing<br />

operating<br />

income<br />

Budgeted fixed manufacturing costs<br />

=<br />

Budgeted production units<br />

= $480,000<br />

8,000 units<br />

= $60 per unit<br />

-<br />

Variable-costing<br />

operating<br />

income<br />

2012: $1,500,000 - $1,380,000 = ($60 per unit * 2,000 units) - ($600 per unit * 0 units)<br />

$120,000 = $120,000<br />

2013: $1,560,000 - $1,650,000 = ($60 per unit * 500 units) - ($60 per unit * 2,000 units)<br />

- $90,000 = -$90,000<br />

2014: $2,340,000 - $2,190,000 = ($60 per unit * 3,000 units) - ($60 per unit * 500 units)<br />

$150,000 = $150,000<br />

3. Subcontracting a large part of manufacturing has greatly reduced the magnitude of<br />

fixed manufacturing costs. This reduction, in turn, means differences between<br />

absorption costing and variable costing are much smaller than in Exhibit 9-2.<br />

4. Given the higher master-budget capacity utilization level of 10,000 units, the budgeted<br />

fixed manufacturing cost rate for 2012 is now as follows:<br />

$480,000<br />

= $48 per unit<br />

10,000 units<br />

The manufacturing cost per unit is $323 ($275 + $48). So, the production-volume variance<br />

for 2012 is<br />

(10,000 units - 8,000 units) * $48 per unit = $96,000 U<br />

The absorption-costing income statement for 2012 is as follows:<br />

=<br />

Fixed manufacturing<br />

costs in ending inventory -<br />

under absorption costing<br />

Fixed manufacturing costs<br />

in beginning inventory<br />

under absorption costing<br />

Revenues: $1,000 per unit * 6,000 units<br />

$6,000,000<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of goods sold:<br />

Beginning inventory 0<br />

Variable manufacturing costs: $275 per unit * 8,000 units<br />

2,200,000<br />

Fixed manufacturing costs: $48 per unit * 8,000 units<br />

ƒƒƒ384,000<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of goods available for sale 2,584,000<br />

Deduct ending inventory: $323 per unit * 2,000 units<br />

ƒƒ(646,000)<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of goods sold (at standard costs) 1,938,000<br />

Adjustment for production-volume variance<br />

ƒƒƒƒ96,000 U<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of goods sold<br />

ƒ2,034,000<br />

Gross margin 3,966,000<br />

Marketing costs: $1,380,000 fixed + ($185 per unit) * (6,000 units sold) ƒ2,490,000<br />

Operating income $1,476,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!