03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

494 CHAPTER 13 STRATEGY, BALANCED SCORECARD, AND STRATEGIC PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS<br />

Total Factor Productivity<br />

Total factor productivity (TFP) is the ratio of the quantity of output produced to the costs of all inputs used based on<br />

current-period prices.<br />

Quantity of output produced<br />

Total factor productivity =<br />

<strong>Cost</strong>s of all inputs used<br />

TFP considers all inputs simultaneously and the trade-offs across inputs based on current input prices. Do not think<br />

of all productivity measures as physical measures lacking financial content—how many units of output are produced<br />

per unit of input. TFP is intricately tied to minimizing total cost—a financial objective.<br />

Calculating and Comparing Total Factor Productivity<br />

We first calculate Chipset’s TFP in 2011, using 2011 prices and 1,150,000 units of output produced (based on information<br />

from the first part of the productivity-component calculations on p. 482).<br />

Total factor productivity<br />

for 2011 using 2011 prices = Quantity of output produced in 2011<br />

<strong>Cost</strong>s of inputs used in 2011 based on 2011 prices<br />

=<br />

1,150,000<br />

(2,900,000 * $1.50) + (3,500,000 * $4.35)<br />

= 1,150,000<br />

$19,575,000<br />

= 0.058748 units of output per dollar of input cost<br />

By itself, the 2011 TFP of 0.058748 units of CX1 per dollar of input costs is not particularly helpful. We need something<br />

to compare the 2011 TFP against. One alternative is to compare TFPs of other similar companies in 2011.<br />

However, finding similar companies and obtaining accurate comparable data are often difficult. Companies, therefore,<br />

usually compare their own TFPs over time. In the Chipset example, we use as a benchmark TFP calculated using<br />

the inputs that Chipset would have used in 2010 to produce 1,150,000 units of CX1 at 2011 prices (that is, we use<br />

the costs calculated from the second part of the productivity-component calculations on p. 482). Why do we use 2011<br />

prices? Because using the current year’s prices in both calculations controls for input-price differences and focuses the<br />

analysis on adjustments the manager made in quantities of inputs in response to changes in prices.<br />

Benchmark<br />

TFP<br />

=<br />

=<br />

Quantity of output produced in 2011<br />

<strong>Cost</strong>s of inputs at 2011 prices that would have been used in 2010<br />

to produce 2011 output<br />

1,150,000<br />

(3,450,000 * $1.50) + (3,750,000 * $4.35)<br />

= 1,150,000<br />

$21,487,500<br />

= 0.053519 units of output per dollar of input cost<br />

Using 2011 prices, TFP increased 9.8% [(058748 – 0.053519) ÷ 0.053519 = 0.098, or 9.8%] from 2010 to 2011.<br />

Note that the 9.8% increase in TFP also equals the $1,912,500 gain (Exhibit 13-5, column 4) divided by the<br />

$19,575,000 of actual costs incurred in 2011 (Exhibit 13-5, column 5). Total factor productivity increased because<br />

Chipset produced more output per dollar of input cost in 2011 relative to 2010, measured in both years using 2011<br />

prices. The gain in TFP occurs because Chipset increases the partial productivities of individual inputs and, consistent<br />

with its strategy, combines inputs to lower costs. Note that increases in TFP cannot be due to differences in input<br />

prices because we used 2011 prices to evaluate both the inputs that Chipset would have used in 2010 to produce<br />

1,150,000 units of CX1 and the inputs actually used in 2011.<br />

Using Partial and Total Factor Productivity Measures<br />

A major advantage of TFP is that it measures the combined productivity of all inputs used to produce output and<br />

explicitly considers gains from using fewer physical inputs as well as substitution among inputs. Managers can analyze<br />

these numbers to understand the reasons for changes in TFP—for example, better human resource management<br />

practices, higher quality of materials, or improved manufacturing methods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!