03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

508 CHAPTER 14 COST ALLOCATION, CUSTOMER-PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS, AND SALES-VARIANCE ANALYSIS<br />

systems using indirect-cost pools and cost drivers for different activities. A major difference<br />

in the lower half of Exhibit 14-4 is the cost pool called Facility <strong>Cost</strong>s (far right, middle<br />

row), which accumulates all annual costs of buildings and furnishings (such as<br />

depreciation) incurred in the division. The arrows in Exhibit 14-4 indicate that CAI allocates<br />

facility costs to the five activity-cost pools. Recall from Exhibit 14-3 that CAI uses<br />

square feet area required for various activities (design, setup, manufacturing, distribution,<br />

and administration) to allocate these facility costs. These activity-cost pools then include<br />

the costs of the building and facilities needed to perform the various activities.<br />

The costs in the six remaining indirect-cost pools (that is, after costs of the facility<br />

cost pool have been allocated to other cost pools) are allocated to products on the basis of<br />

cost drivers described in Exhibit 14-3. These cost drivers are chosen as the cost-allocation<br />

bases because there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the cost drivers and the<br />

costs in the indirect-cost pool. A cost rate per unit is calculated for each cost-allocation<br />

base. Indirect costs are allocated to products on the basis of the total quantity of the cost<br />

allocation base for each activity used by the product.<br />

Next focus on the upper half of Exhibit 14-4: how corporate costs are allocated to<br />

divisions and then to indirect-cost pools.<br />

Before getting into the details of the allocations, let’s first consider some broader<br />

choices that CAI faces regarding the allocation of corporate costs.<br />

Allocating Corporate <strong>Cost</strong>s to Divisions and Products<br />

CAI’s management team has several choices to make when accumulating and allocating<br />

corporate costs to divisions.<br />

1. Which corporate-cost categories should CAI allocate as indirect costs of the divisions?<br />

Should CAI allocate all corporate costs or only some of them?<br />

Some companies allocate all corporate costs to divisions because corporate costs<br />

are incurred to support division activities. Allocating all corporate costs motivates<br />

division managers to examine how corporate costs are planned and controlled.<br />

Also, companies that want to calculate the full cost of products must allocate all<br />

corporate costs to indirect-cost pools of divisions.<br />

Other companies do not allocate corporate costs to divisions because these costs<br />

are not controllable by division managers.<br />

Still other companies allocate only those corporate costs, such as corporate human<br />

resources, that are widely perceived as causally related to division activities or that<br />

provide explicit benefits to divisions. These companies exclude corporate costs<br />

such as corporate donations to charitable foundations because division managers<br />

often have no say in making these decisions and because the benefits to the divisions<br />

are less evident or too remote. If a company decides not to allocate some or<br />

all corporate costs, this results in total company profitability being less than the<br />

sum of individual division or product profitabilities.<br />

For some decision purposes, allocating some but not all corporate costs to<br />

divisions may be the preferred alternative. Consider the performance evaluation of<br />

division managers. The controllability notion (see p. 200) is frequently used to justify<br />

excluding some corporate costs from division reports. For example, salaries of<br />

the top management at corporate headquarters are often excluded from responsibility<br />

accounting reports of division managers. Although divisions tend to benefit<br />

from these corporate costs, division managers argue they have no say in (“are not<br />

responsible for”) how much of these corporate resources they use or how much<br />

they cost. The contrary argument is that full allocation is justified because the divisions<br />

receive benefits from all corporate costs.<br />

2. When allocating corporate costs to divisions, should CAI allocate only costs that vary<br />

with division activity or should the company assign fixed costs as well? Companies<br />

allocate both variable and fixed costs to divisions and then to products, because the<br />

resulting product costs are useful for making long-run strategic decisions, such as<br />

which products to sell and at what price. To make good long-run decisions, managers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!