03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INSPECTION POINTS AND ALLOCATING COSTS OF NORMAL SPOILAGE 653<br />

amount of normal and abnormal spoilage? As before, consider the forming department,<br />

and recall that direct materials are added at the start of production, while conversion<br />

costs are added evenly during the process.<br />

Consider three different cases: Inspection occurs at (1) the 20%, (2) the 55%, or<br />

(3) the 100% completion stage. The last option is the one we have analyzed so far (see<br />

Exhibit 18-2). Assume that normal spoilage is 10% of the good units passing inspection.<br />

A total of 1,000 units are spoiled in all three cases. Normal spoilage is computed on the<br />

basis of the number of good units that pass the inspection point during the current period.<br />

The following data are for July 2012. Note how the number of units of normal and<br />

abnormal spoilage changes, depending on when inspection occurs.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

A<br />

Flow of Production<br />

Work in process, beginning a<br />

Started during July<br />

To account for<br />

Good units completed and transferred out<br />

(10,000 – 1,000 spoiled – 2,000 ending)<br />

Normal spoilage<br />

Abnormal spoilage (1,000 – normal spoilage)<br />

Work in process, ending b<br />

Accounted for<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Physical Units: Stage of Completion at<br />

Which Inspection Occurs<br />

20%<br />

1,500<br />

8,500<br />

10,000<br />

7,000<br />

750 c<br />

250<br />

2,000<br />

10,000<br />

55%<br />

1,500<br />

8,500<br />

10,000<br />

7,000<br />

550 d<br />

450<br />

2,000<br />

10,000<br />

100%<br />

1,500<br />

8,500<br />

10,000<br />

7,000<br />

700 e<br />

300<br />

2,000<br />

10,000<br />

12<br />

13<br />

a Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 60%.<br />

14<br />

b Degree of completion in this department: direct materials, 100%; conversion costs, 50%.<br />

15<br />

c 10% × (8,500 units started – 1,000 units spoiled), because only the units started passed the 20% completion<br />

16 inspection point in the current period. Beginning work in process is excluded from this calculation because,<br />

17 being 60% complete at the start of the period, it passed the inspection point in the previous period.<br />

18<br />

d 10% × (8,500 units started – 1,000 units spoiled – 2,000 units in ending work in process). Both beginning and<br />

19 ending work in process are excluded since neither was inspected this period.<br />

20<br />

e 10% × 7,000, because 7,000 units are fully completed and inspected in the current period.<br />

The following diagram shows the flow of physical units for July and illustrates the<br />

normal spoilage numbers in the table. Note that 7,000 good units are completed and<br />

transferred out—1,500 from beginning work in process and 5,500 started and completed<br />

during the period—while 2,000 units are in ending work in process.<br />

0% 20% 50% 55% 60%<br />

100%<br />

1,500 units from beginning work in process<br />

5,500 units started and completed<br />

Work done on 2,000 units in ending work in process<br />

To see the number of units passing each inspection point, consider in the diagram the vertical<br />

lines at the 20%, 55%, and 100% inspection points. Note that the vertical line at<br />

20% crosses two horizontal lines—5,500 good units started and completed and<br />

2,000 units in ending work in process—for a total of 7,500 good units. (The 20% vertical<br />

line does not cross the line representing work done on the 1,500 good units completed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!