03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

726 CHAPTER 20 INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, JUST-IN-TIME, AND SIMPLIFIED COSTING METHODS<br />

Extending Example 3, backflush costing systems could use the sale of finished goods<br />

as the only trigger point. This version of backflush costing is most suitable for a JIT production<br />

system with minimal direct materials, work-in-process, and finished goods inventories.<br />

That’s because this backflush costing system maintains no inventory accounts.<br />

Special Considerations in Backflush <strong>Cost</strong>ing<br />

The accounting procedures illustrated in Examples 1, 2, and 3 do not strictly adhere to<br />

generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). For example, work in process inventory,<br />

which is an asset, exists although it is not recognized in the financial accounting system.<br />

Advocates of backflush costing, however, cite the generally accepted accounting principle<br />

of materiality in support of the various versions of backflush costing. As the three examples<br />

illustrate, backflush costing can approximate the costs that would be reported under<br />

sequential tracking by varying the number of trigger points and where they are located. If<br />

significant amounts of direct materials inventory or finished goods inventory exist, adjusting<br />

entries can be incorporated into backflush costing (as explained next).<br />

Suppose there are material differences in operating income and inventories based on<br />

a backflush costing system and a conventional standard-costing system. A journal entry<br />

can be recorded to adjust the backflush number to satisfy GAAP. For example, the backflush<br />

entries in Example 2 would result in expensing all conversion costs to <strong>Cost</strong> of<br />

Goods Sold ($1,188,000 at standard costs + $72,000 write-off of underallocated conversion<br />

costs = $1,260,000). But suppose conversion costs were regarded as sufficiently<br />

material in amount to be included in Inventory Control. Then entry (D2) in Example 2,<br />

closing the Conversion <strong>Cost</strong>s accounts, would change as follows:<br />

Original entry (D2) Conversion <strong>Cost</strong>s Allocated 1,188,000<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of Goods Sold 72,000<br />

Conversion <strong>Cost</strong>s Control 1,260,000<br />

Revised entry (D2) Conversion <strong>Cost</strong>s Allocated 1,188,000<br />

Inventory Control (1,000 units * $12) 12,000<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> of Goods Sold 60,000<br />

Conversion <strong>Cost</strong>s Control 1,260,000<br />

Decision<br />

Point<br />

How does backflush<br />

costing simplify<br />

traditional inventory<br />

costing?<br />

Learning<br />

Objective 8<br />

Understand the<br />

principles of lean<br />

accounting<br />

. . . focus on costing<br />

value streams rather<br />

than products, and limit<br />

arbitrary allocations<br />

Critics say backflush costing leaves no audit trails—the ability of the accounting system to<br />

pinpoint the uses of resources at each step of the production process. However, the<br />

absence of sizable amounts of materials inventory, work-in-process inventory, and finished<br />

goods inventory means managers can keep track of operations by personal observations,<br />

computer monitoring, and nonfinancial measures.<br />

What are the implications of JIT and backflush costing systems for activity-based costing<br />

(ABC) systems? Simplifying the production process, as in a JIT system, makes more of<br />

the costs direct and reduces the extent of overhead cost allocations. Simple ABC systems<br />

are often adequate for companies implementing JIT. These simple ABC systems work well<br />

with backflush costing. <strong>Cost</strong>s from ABC systems yield more-accurate budgeted conversion<br />

cost per unit for different products in the backflush costing system. The activity-based cost<br />

information is also useful for product costing, decision making, and cost management.<br />

Lean <strong>Accounting</strong><br />

Another approach for simplified product costing in JIT (or lean production) systems is<br />

lean accounting. Successful JIT production requires companies to focus on the entire<br />

value chain of business functions (from suppliers to manufacturing to customers) in<br />

order to reduce inventories, lead times, and waste. The emphasis on improvements<br />

throughout the value chain has led some JIT companies to develop organization structures<br />

and costing systems that focus on value streams, which are all the value-added<br />

activities needed to design, manufacture, and deliver a given product or product line to<br />

customers. For example, a value stream can include the activities needed to develop and<br />

engineer products, advertise and market those products, process orders, purchase and<br />

receive materials, manufacture and ship orders, bill customers, and collect payments.<br />

The focus on value streams is aided by the use of manufacturing cells in JIT systems that<br />

group together the operations needed to make a given product or product line.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!