03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CONCEPT OF RELEVANCE 393<br />

Relevant <strong>Cost</strong>s and Relevant Revenues<br />

Relevant costs are expected future costs, and relevant revenues are expected future<br />

revenues that differ among the alternative courses of action being considered.<br />

Revenues and costs that are not relevant are said to be irrelevant. It is important to<br />

recognize that to be relevant costs and relevant revenues they must:<br />

Occur in the future—every decision deals with selecting a course of action based on<br />

its expected future results.<br />

Differ among the alternative courses of action—costs and revenues that do not differ<br />

will not matter and, hence, will have no bearing on the decision being made.<br />

The question is always, “What difference will an action make?”<br />

Exhibit 11-2 presents the financial data underlying the choice between the do-notreorganize<br />

and reorganize alternatives for Precision Sporting Goods. There are two ways<br />

to analyze the data. The first considers “All revenues and costs,” while the second considers<br />

only “Relevant revenues and costs.”<br />

The first two columns describe the first way and present all data. The last two<br />

columns describe the second way and present only relevant costs—the $640,000 and<br />

$480,000 expected future manufacturing labor costs and the $90,000 expected future<br />

reorganization costs that differ between the two alternatives. The revenues, direct materials,<br />

manufacturing overhead, and marketing items can be ignored because they will<br />

remain the same whether or not Precision Sporting Goods reorganizes. They do not differ<br />

between the alternatives and, therefore, are irrelevant.<br />

Note, the past (historical) manufacturing hourly wage rate of $14 and total past (historical)<br />

manufacturing labor costs of $560,000 (20 workers * 2,000 hours per worker<br />

per year * $14 per hour) do not appear in Exhibit 11-2. Although they may be a useful<br />

basis for making informed predictions of the expected future manufacturing labor costs of<br />

$640,000 and $480,000, historical costs themselves are past costs that, therefore, are<br />

irrelevant to decision making. Past costs are also called sunk costs because they are<br />

unavoidable and cannot be changed no matter what action is taken.<br />

The analysis in Exhibit 11-2 indicates that reorganizing the manufacturing operations<br />

will increase predicted operating income by $70,000 each year. Note that the managers at<br />

Precision Sporting Goods reach the same conclusion whether they use all data or include only<br />

relevant data in the analysis. By confining the analysis to only the relevant data, managers<br />

Learning<br />

Objective 2<br />

Distinguish relevant<br />

from irrelevant<br />

information in decision<br />

situations<br />

. . . only costs and<br />

revenues that are<br />

expected to occur in the<br />

future and differ among<br />

alternative courses of<br />

action are relevant<br />

Exhibit 11-2<br />

Determining Relevant Revenues and Relevant <strong>Cost</strong>s for Precision<br />

Sporting Goods<br />

All Revenues and <strong>Cost</strong>s<br />

Relevant Revenues and <strong>Cost</strong>s<br />

Alternative 1: Alternative 2: Alternative 1: Alternative 2:<br />

Do Not Reorganize Reorganize Do Not Reorganize Reorganize<br />

Revenues a $6,250,000 $6,250,000 — —<br />

<strong>Cost</strong>s:<br />

Direct materials b 1,250,000 1,250,000 — —<br />

Manufacturing labor 640,000 c 480,000 d $ 640,000 c $ 480,000 d<br />

Manufacturing overhead 750,000 750,000 — —<br />

Marketing 2,000,000 2,000,000 — —<br />

Reorganization costs — 90,000 — 90,000<br />

Total costs 4,640,000 4,570,000 640,000 570,000<br />

Operating income $1,610,000 $1,680,000 $(640,000) $(570,000)<br />

$70,000 Difference $70,000 Difference<br />

a 25,000 units $250 per unit = $6,250,000 c 20 workers 2,000 hours per worker $16 per hour = $640,000<br />

b 25,000 units $50 per unit = $1,250,000 d 15 workers 2,000 hours per worker $16 per hour = $480,000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!