03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROBLEM FOR SELF-STUDY 491<br />

In summary, the net increase in operating income attributable to productivity equals the<br />

following:<br />

Income<br />

Statement<br />

Amounts<br />

in 2010<br />

(1)<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> effect of productivity:<br />

Direct material costs<br />

$33,000 F<br />

Conversion costs 0<br />

Selling and customer-service costs<br />

ƒ25,000 F<br />

Change in operating income due to productivity $58,000 F<br />

A summary of the change in operating income between 2010 and 2011 follows:<br />

Revenue and<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> Effects<br />

of Growth<br />

Component<br />

in 2011<br />

(2)<br />

Revenue and<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> Effects of<br />

Price-Recovery<br />

Component<br />

in 2011<br />

(3)<br />

<strong>Cost</strong> Effect<br />

of Productivity<br />

Component<br />

in 2011<br />

(4)<br />

Income Statement<br />

Amounts in 2011<br />

(5) = (1) + (2) + (3) + (4)<br />

Revenue $4,000,000 $200,000 F $420,000 F — $4,620,000<br />

<strong>Cost</strong>s ƒ2,920,000 ƒƒ60,000 U ƒ256,000 U $58,000 F ƒ3,178,000<br />

Operating<br />

income $1,080,000 $140,000 F $164,000 F $58,000 F $1,442,000<br />

362,000 F<br />

Change in operating income<br />

3. Effect of the Industry-Market-Size Factor on Operating Income<br />

Of the increase in sales from 40,000 to 42,000 units, 3%, or 1,200 units (0.03 *<br />

40,000), is due to growth in market size, and 800 units (2,000 – 1,200) are due to an<br />

increase in market share. The change in Westwood’s operating income from the<br />

industry-market-size factor rather than specific strategic actions is as follows:<br />

$140,000 (column 2 of preceding table) *<br />

1,200 units<br />

2,000 units<br />

$84,000 F<br />

Effect of Product Differentiation on Operating Income<br />

Increase in the selling price of KE8 (revenue effect of the price-recovery component)<br />

Increase in prices of inputs (cost effect of the price-recovery component)<br />

Growth in market share due to product differentiation<br />

800 units<br />

$140,000 (column 2 of preceding table) *<br />

2,000 units<br />

Change in operating income due to product differentiation<br />

$420,000 F<br />

256,000 U<br />

ƒƒ56,000 F<br />

$220,000 F<br />

Effect of <strong>Cost</strong> Leadership on Operating Income<br />

Productivity component<br />

$ƒ58,000 F<br />

A summary of the net increase in operating income from 2010 to 2011 follows:<br />

Change due to the industry-market-size factor<br />

Change due to product differentiation<br />

Change due to cost leadership<br />

Change in operating income<br />

$ 84,000 F<br />

220,000 F<br />

ƒƒ58,000 F<br />

$362,000 F<br />

4. The analysis of operating income indicates that a significant amount of the increase in<br />

operating income resulted from Westwood’s successful implementation of its productdifferentiation<br />

strategy. The company was able to continue to charge a premium price<br />

for KE8 while increasing market share. Westwood was also able to earn additional<br />

operating income from improving its productivity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!