03.05.2017 Views

Cost Accounting (14th Edition)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

332 CHAPTER 9 INVENTORY COSTING AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS<br />

Required<br />

1. Prepare income statements based on variable costing for each of the two years.<br />

2. Prepare income statements based on absorption costing for each of the two years.<br />

3. Prepare a numerical reconciliation and explanation of the difference between operating income for<br />

each year under absorption costing and variable costing.<br />

4. Critics have claimed that a widely used accounting system has led to undesirable buildups of inventory<br />

levels. (a) Is variable costing or absorption costing more likely to lead to such buildups? Why? (b) What<br />

can be done to counteract undesirable inventory buildups?<br />

9-24 Variable and absorption costing, sales, and operating-income changes. Helmetsmart, a threeyear-old<br />

company, has been producing and selling a single type of bicycle helmet. Helmetsmart uses standard<br />

costing. After reviewing the income statements for the first three years, Stuart Weil, president of<br />

Helmetsmart, commented, “I was told by our accountants—and in fact, I have memorized—that our<br />

breakeven volume is 49,000 units. I was happy that we reached that sales goal in each of our first two years.<br />

But, here’s the strange thing: In our first year, we sold 49,000 units and indeed we broke even. Then, in our<br />

second year we sold the same volume and had a positive operating income. I didn’t complain, of course . . .<br />

but here’s the bad part. In our third year, we sold 20% more helmets, but our operating income fell by more<br />

than 80% relative to the second year! We didn’t change our selling price or cost structure over the past<br />

three years and have no price, efficiency, or spending variances . . . so what’s going on?!”<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

1<br />

Absorption <strong>Cost</strong>ing<br />

2<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

3<br />

Sales (units)<br />

49,000<br />

49,000<br />

58,800<br />

4<br />

Revenues<br />

$1,960,000<br />

$1,960,000<br />

$2,352,000<br />

5 <strong>Cost</strong> of goods sold<br />

6<br />

Beginning inventory<br />

0<br />

0<br />

352,800<br />

7<br />

Production<br />

1,764,000<br />

2,116,800<br />

1,764,000<br />

8 Available for sale<br />

1,764,000<br />

2,116,800<br />

2,116,800<br />

9<br />

Deduct ending inventory<br />

0<br />

(352,800)<br />

0<br />

10<br />

Adjustment for production-volume variance<br />

0<br />

(215,600)<br />

0<br />

11 <strong>Cost</strong> of goods sold<br />

1,764,000<br />

1,548,400<br />

2,116,800<br />

12<br />

Gross margin<br />

196,000<br />

411,600<br />

235,200<br />

13<br />

Selling and administrative expenses (all fixed)<br />

196,000<br />

196,000<br />

196,000<br />

14 Operating income<br />

$ 0<br />

$ 215,600<br />

$ 39,200<br />

15<br />

16<br />

Beginning inventory<br />

0<br />

0<br />

9,800<br />

17<br />

Production (units)<br />

49,000<br />

58,800<br />

49,000<br />

18<br />

Sales (units)<br />

49,000<br />

49,000<br />

58,800<br />

19<br />

Ending inventory<br />

0<br />

9,800<br />

0<br />

20<br />

Variable manufacturing cost per unit<br />

$ 14<br />

$ 14<br />

$ 14<br />

21<br />

Fixed manufacturing overhead costs<br />

$1,078,000<br />

$1,078,000<br />

$1,078,000<br />

22<br />

Fixed manuf. costs allocated per unit produced<br />

$ 22<br />

$ 22<br />

$ 22<br />

Required<br />

1. What denominator level is Helmetsmart using to allocate fixed manufacturing costs to the bicycle helmets?<br />

How is Helmetsmart disposing of any favorable or unfavorable production-volume variance at<br />

the end of the year? Explain your answer briefly.<br />

2. How did Helmetsmart’s accountants arrive at the breakeven volume of 49,000 units?<br />

3. Prepare a variable costing-based income statement for each year. Explain the variation in variable<br />

costing operating income for each year based on contribution margin per unit and sales volume.<br />

4. Reconcile the operating incomes under variable costing and absorption costing for each year, and use<br />

this information to explain to Stuart Weil the positive operating income in 2012 and the drop in operating<br />

income in 2013.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!