ISRRT_COVID-19_book
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
months of the pandemic we only used masks if the patients we examined were at risk of<br />
having <strong>COVID</strong>-<strong>19</strong>. As the pandemic progressed, we would wear a surgical mask every time we<br />
have a contact with any patients, whether they had <strong>COVID</strong>-<strong>19</strong> or not. We wore FFP2 / KN95<br />
masks exclusively for the examination of <strong>COVID</strong>-<strong>19</strong>-patients and eventually for every contact<br />
with patients; we also changed masks after we had contact with a known <strong>COVID</strong>-<strong>19</strong>-patient.<br />
Every time my hospital updated its policy on wearing masks the latest policy became more<br />
stringent. Interestingly, some of my colleagues said that masks are ineffective because we<br />
breathe in air from around the mask as the seal to our skin isn’t that efficient for certain types<br />
of masks. However, the FFP2 / KN95 masks have a better fit to the skin, but even these are<br />
not always close enough at every point of the face, especially the part between nose and<br />
cheek.<br />
Other colleagues appeared to care more about the environment and were disappointed with<br />
all the waste that was produced as a consequence of using disposable face masks. In the end,<br />
we all agreed that next time it would be best to start with using FFP2 masks instead of using<br />
surgical masks. But there is another reason to wear FFP2 / KN95 masks right from the<br />
beginning and by each and every contact with patients. When the pandemic was in the early<br />
phase it happened to me personally, when I received a call from one of the leading medical<br />
practitioners (doctors) of a ward for internal medicine. She asked me which radiographer had<br />
processed an X-ray image for a particular patient. I checked the system and said that I did it.<br />
She ordered me to get a PCR-Test because this patient had developed symptoms for <strong>COVID</strong>-<br />
<strong>19</strong> and was now isolated. The quick-test of this patient, which was processed earlier, was<br />
negative but the PCR-Test which was processed later shows a positive result. From this I<br />
deduced not all tests for <strong>COVID</strong>-<strong>19</strong> are 100% accurate; subsequently this has been borne out<br />
in practice and the literature. Fortunately, my test was negative; unfortunately I spent<br />
Pentecost 2020 alone and isolated in my apartment waiting for the results.<br />
Another ambitious aim in my hospital was that every new patient should be isolated until a<br />
PCR-Test is processed and proven negative. This way the responsible staff of my hospital tries<br />
to detect asymptomatic patients faster because the very last thing wanted was that it spreads<br />
around the whole hospital. As a radiographer you have a lot of contact with many patients in<br />
a wide range of clinical settings. Radiographers therefore could become vectors for spreading<br />
74