06.01.2013 Views

Communications Regulatory Authority

Communications Regulatory Authority

Communications Regulatory Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The same supervisory action was carried out with respect to the methods used to<br />

provide services of the same kind, which were already being offered on other numbers<br />

at an extra charge ( “892XXX” numbers), and could still be provided also after the<br />

coming into force of “12XY” numbers.<br />

Since 1 October 2005, with the entry into force of “12XY” numbers for the provision<br />

of the directory inquiry service, AGCOM has monitored their correct use both as<br />

regards information provided to users and as regards the fairness of rates charged, in<br />

connection with the ceiling set for rates per answered call and per minute pursuant to<br />

Resolution no. 15/04/CIR.<br />

As to information to users it should be highlighted that, in confirming<br />

regulations already included in the Numbering Plan (Resolution no. 9/03/CIR) for all<br />

extra-charge numbers – a category under which the number in question falls – the<br />

above-mentioned resolution provides for the following requirement, under article 3,<br />

paragraph 2, letter h, among the conditions imposed on the use of such numbers: “to<br />

make the caller aware, free of charge, of the cost of calling the 12xy number and of the<br />

cost of the call completion service possibly requested by the user”. Therefore, rather<br />

than allowing any cost information methods based on a simple reference to a toll-free<br />

number (“800XXXXXX” numbers), AGCOM allowed that - upon full information<br />

about rates - an announcement be conveyed informing only of the maximum rate for<br />

calls from fixed lines and from mobile networks.<br />

As from 1 December 2005 AGCOM set the deadline for the discontinuance of<br />

the directory inquiry service offered by access operators on the so-called “network<br />

internal set of numbers beginning with 4XX” (operators had mostly used the “412”<br />

which reminded users of the traditional number “12” on which the service had<br />

previously been provided). In order to assure that users be supplied with such adequate<br />

information as not to offer unfair competitive advantages to access operators, AGCOM<br />

promptly took action (Resolution no. 83/05/CIR) for the purpose of laying down<br />

detailed methods to discontinue “412” numbers, and prescribed that operators convey<br />

announcements with adequate characteristics for at least six months on the same<br />

number.<br />

Resolution no. 83/05/CIR required that operators disclose service rates, which<br />

are then published on AGCOM’s web site so to enable users to compare different offers<br />

easily.<br />

On the whole, the supervisory action aimed at protecting users and market<br />

competitive conditions covered several aspects related to the compliance with the<br />

conditions on which the number allocation is based.<br />

In particular, AGCOM’s monitoring action was focused both on the need to<br />

assure adequate free-of-charge information to users with regard to service rates, and on<br />

the need to provide a nationwide service that could be reached by all communications<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!