Communications Regulatory Authority
Communications Regulatory Authority
Communications Regulatory Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with Resolution no. 136/05/CONS, the “policy provision” provides for the need to<br />
“identify such mechanisms as can make the 40% transfer of broadcasting capacity to<br />
independent undertakings an effective and substantial one, as regards transparency of<br />
imposed terms and the selection of the contracting parties, in order to strengthen<br />
pluralism and competition”.<br />
To that end, a measure might be adopted to further set out the obligation to<br />
reserve some broadcasting capacity for independent content providers, within the 40%<br />
share of broadcasting capacity of digital terrestrial networks. In particular, AGCOM<br />
explained its intention to set out and handle a competitive procedure for a minimum<br />
channel line-up to be guaranteed all over the country.<br />
The “policy provision” also outlines the content of adoptable measures, and<br />
identifies transparency, equal treatment and cost-orientation of the terms and conditions<br />
of offer as proportional obligations to that end. Such terms will be adequately<br />
advertised, as they shall be disclosed to the market through a reference offer. In the<br />
framework of this range of guarantees, AGCOM shall also verify that undertakings<br />
adopt a cost accounting system in line with regulatory obligations. For these strategic<br />
objectives to be implemented, the “policy provision” provides for the possibility,<br />
among other things, to activate the measure revision clause pursuant to Resolution no.<br />
136/05/CONS.<br />
Network access guarantees were then the underlying theme of the action carried<br />
out by AGCOM over the past year in order to protect competition and pluralism. This<br />
market’s competitive value was also confirmed by the latest assessments. In this<br />
connection, suffice it to mention the analysis of the market for radio and television<br />
broadcasting services for the broadcasting of content to end users (the so-called “market<br />
no. 18”), in whose context – pending proceedings - AGCOM identified a collective<br />
dominance position involving RAI and RTI, with regard to the national market for<br />
analog television broadcasting services on terrestrial networks (see par. 2.1.).<br />
Licensees’ programming obligations<br />
In the framework of the sanctioning action carried out by AGCOM following<br />
complaints, mention is briefly made of the following four categories of relevant<br />
programming obligations:<br />
1. programme register keeping;<br />
2. programme recording keeping;<br />
3. interconnection;<br />
4. programming duration.<br />
172