06.01.2013 Views

Communications Regulatory Authority

Communications Regulatory Authority

Communications Regulatory Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with Resolution no. 136/05/CONS, the “policy provision” provides for the need to<br />

“identify such mechanisms as can make the 40% transfer of broadcasting capacity to<br />

independent undertakings an effective and substantial one, as regards transparency of<br />

imposed terms and the selection of the contracting parties, in order to strengthen<br />

pluralism and competition”.<br />

To that end, a measure might be adopted to further set out the obligation to<br />

reserve some broadcasting capacity for independent content providers, within the 40%<br />

share of broadcasting capacity of digital terrestrial networks. In particular, AGCOM<br />

explained its intention to set out and handle a competitive procedure for a minimum<br />

channel line-up to be guaranteed all over the country.<br />

The “policy provision” also outlines the content of adoptable measures, and<br />

identifies transparency, equal treatment and cost-orientation of the terms and conditions<br />

of offer as proportional obligations to that end. Such terms will be adequately<br />

advertised, as they shall be disclosed to the market through a reference offer. In the<br />

framework of this range of guarantees, AGCOM shall also verify that undertakings<br />

adopt a cost accounting system in line with regulatory obligations. For these strategic<br />

objectives to be implemented, the “policy provision” provides for the possibility,<br />

among other things, to activate the measure revision clause pursuant to Resolution no.<br />

136/05/CONS.<br />

Network access guarantees were then the underlying theme of the action carried<br />

out by AGCOM over the past year in order to protect competition and pluralism. This<br />

market’s competitive value was also confirmed by the latest assessments. In this<br />

connection, suffice it to mention the analysis of the market for radio and television<br />

broadcasting services for the broadcasting of content to end users (the so-called “market<br />

no. 18”), in whose context – pending proceedings - AGCOM identified a collective<br />

dominance position involving RAI and RTI, with regard to the national market for<br />

analog television broadcasting services on terrestrial networks (see par. 2.1.).<br />

Licensees’ programming obligations<br />

In the framework of the sanctioning action carried out by AGCOM following<br />

complaints, mention is briefly made of the following four categories of relevant<br />

programming obligations:<br />

1. programme register keeping;<br />

2. programme recording keeping;<br />

3. interconnection;<br />

4. programming duration.<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!