06.01.2013 Views

journal of digital research & publishing - The Sydney eScholarship ...

journal of digital research & publishing - The Sydney eScholarship ...

journal of digital research & publishing - The Sydney eScholarship ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1 P M J O U R N A L O F D I G I T A L R ESEARCH & P UBLISHING<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are just some <strong>of</strong> the factors intersecting in recent years, setting the scene for a rise<br />

in what are known as ‘patient advocates’ in the health care space. <strong>The</strong> patient advocates <strong>of</strong><br />

concern to this paper act for thousands <strong>of</strong> people, rather than for the individual, and most<br />

commonly ‘specialise’ in one type <strong>of</strong> illness. <strong>The</strong>y generate a substantial following with<br />

their command <strong>of</strong> Internet publication modes, challenge traditional notions <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

authority and they are not going away anytime soon.<br />

As far back (relatively speaking) as 1973, long before the Internet became the pervasive<br />

communication technology in the developed world, medical sociologist Marie Haug<br />

$8%"6$4%8& 3& 6>%"8& 7D& 8%]'>7D%**$7"3#$*36$7"& 7D& 6+7*%& G7>H$",& $"& 6+%& 0%8$53#& 4%#8& $"&<br />

post­industrial society largely due to technology opening up access to information. She<br />

argued that this came about as a result <strong>of</strong> technological advancement and that the de­<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalisation is characterised by loss <strong>of</strong> ‘‘their monopoly over knowledge, public<br />

belief in their service ethos, and expectations <strong>of</strong> work autonomy and authority over the<br />

client’’ (1973, p. 197).<br />

More recently, survey data from the US clearly demonstrates that both patients and<br />

general Internet users alike are accessing the Internet in large numbers for health<br />

information. A 2003 study (Von Knoop, Lovich, Silverstein, & Tutty,2003) found that<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> all patients go online for health­related information and that <strong>of</strong> those within a<br />

certain segment (who desire the greatest control in their health care), slightly more prefer<br />

to get their health information from the web (46%) rather than from their doctor (45%)<br />

(Von Knoop et al., 2003). More recent <strong>research</strong> by <strong>The</strong> Pew Internet and American Life<br />

Project (Fox and Jones: 2009) reports that 74% <strong>of</strong> American adults use the Internet and<br />

that 83% <strong>of</strong> them look online for health information (regardless <strong>of</strong> whether they have a<br />

chronic disease or not). However, 86% <strong>of</strong> the respondents from the most recent survey are<br />

also still getting this information from a health pr<strong>of</strong>essional. Health information and the<br />

access to it is just one <strong>of</strong> the many factors at play in the shifting landscape <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

and the construction <strong>of</strong> authority.<br />

This paper will look at the social and technological context in which patient advocates<br />

have come in to existence and the factors driving their rise to prominence. <strong>The</strong> focus<br />

<strong>of</strong> this paper is on the United States owing to the majority <strong>of</strong> existing <strong>research</strong> and<br />

literature originating there. However, the content is also applicable in most instances to<br />

other developed nations, due to the global nature <strong>of</strong> the Internet and similar cultural and<br />

medical constructs.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!