Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Analysis 1.26. Comparison 1 Cardiorespiratory training versus control - end of intervention, Outcome 26
Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - depression score.
Review: Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Comparison: 1 Cardiorespiratory training versus control - end of intervention
Outcome: 26 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - depression score
Study or subgroup Training Control Mean Difference Weight Mean Difference
1 During usual care
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD) IV,Random,95% CI IV,Random,95% CI
Bateman 2001 24 5.54 (3.26) 36 6.94 (3.82) 100.0 % -1.40 [ -3.21, 0.41 ]
Subtotal (95% CI) 24 36 100.0 % -1.40 [ -3.21, 0.41 ]
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.52 (P = 0.13)
2 After usual care
Subtotal (95% CI) 0 0 0.0 % 0.0 [ 0.0, 0.0 ]
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: not applicable
Total (95% CI) 24 36 100.0 % -1.40 [ -3.21, 0.41 ]
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.52 (P = 0.13)
Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable
-10 -5 0 5 10
Favours training Favours control
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Cardiorespiratory training versus control - end of retention follow-up, Outcome
1 Case fatality.
Review: Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Comparison: 2 Cardiorespiratory training versus control - end of retention follow-up
Outcome: 1 Case fatality
Study or subgroup Training Control Odds Ratio Weight Odds Ratio
n/N n/N M-H,Random,95% CI M-H,Random,95% CI
Katz-Leurer 2003 1/42 2/39 100.0 % 0.45 [ 0.04, 5.18 ]
Total (95% CI) 42 39 100.0 % 0.45 [ 0.04, 5.18 ]
Total events: 1 (Training), 2 (Control)
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: Z = 0.64 (P = 0.52)
Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable
0.002 0.1 1 10 500
Favours training Favours control
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review)
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
126