06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Continued)<br />

and the treadmill <strong>training</strong> volume comprised only approximately 10% of <strong>patients</strong><br />

Langhammer 2009 Not valid comparison (physiotherapy versus self-initiated exercise)<br />

Langhammer 2010 Not valid comparison (treadmill gait <strong>training</strong> versus walking outdoors)<br />

Laufer 2001 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: comparison of treadmill ambulation and overground walking.<br />

No relevant comparisons<br />

LEAPS No relevant comparisons<br />

Lee 2008 Not valid control<br />

Lennon 2009 Not valid comparison (aerobic exercises plus lifestyle counselling and risk reduction programme versus<br />

risk reduction programme)<br />

Leveille 1998 Contained few people with <strong>stroke</strong>: intervention (8%), control (9%). Not a valid intervention - other healthy<br />

living interventions included. Not a valid control - provided access to <strong>training</strong> facilities of intervention<br />

group<br />

Lin 2004 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Lincoln 1999 Interventions not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: comprised additional physiotherapy<br />

Lincoln 2003 Comparison of 2 physiotherapy approaches<br />

Lindsley 1994 This was published as an abstract only, the numerical data were not included and could not be recovered<br />

from the authors This intervention may have been <strong>training</strong> although the abstract contained no mention<br />

of progression<br />

Liston 2000 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Logan 2003 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: comprised leisure activities, although sport was included<br />

Logigian 1983 No relevant comparisons: comparison of traditional and facilitation techniques. Intervention not physical<br />

<strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: although <strong>training</strong> elements may have been included it would be difficult to separate the<br />

effect of <strong>training</strong> from therapy<br />

Lord 2008 Not valid comparison (functional gait activities in community environments versus physiotherapy including<br />

treadmill gait <strong>training</strong>)<br />

Luft 2004 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>. Control group contained physical activity not linked to usual<br />

care<br />

Luft 2008 Not valid comparison (treadmill gait <strong>training</strong> versus stretching exercises)<br />

Macko 2005 Control group is not non-exercise, or conventional treatment<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!