06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Richards 1993 (Continued)<br />

Interventions Intervention: mixed <strong>training</strong>: task-oriented gait <strong>training</strong> programme which used a tilt table,<br />

resisted exercises using a Kinetron, and treadmill walking, 104 minutes/day 5 days per week<br />

<strong>for</strong> 5 weeks; progression achieved via velocity and resistance (Kinetron) increments<br />

Control: traditional neurophysical techniques 109 minutes/day 5 days per week <strong>for</strong> 5 weeks<br />

Setting: hospital<br />

Outcomes Included outcomes: Barthel Ambulation scores; BBS; gait velocity<br />

Other outcomes: Fugl-Meyer balance; Fugl-Meyer upper and lower extremity scores<br />

Notes A second control group of early conventional therapy was not used <strong>for</strong> comparison since<br />

it differed from the institution usual care; it commenced earlier than usual during hospital<br />

care and had substantially longer contact time<br />

Risk of bias<br />

Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />

Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported<br />

Richards 2004<br />

Methods Design: randomised trial of mixed <strong>training</strong> plus % usual care versus usual care - during<br />

usual care<br />

Randomisation mechanism: unknown; method: variable blocks stratified on time since<br />

<strong>stroke</strong>, disability, and age<br />

Allocation concealment: unknown<br />

Blinding: investigator; efficacy unknown<br />

Intention-to-treat: yes<br />

Measurements: end of intervention (8 weeks) and 3-month follow-up<br />

Withdrawals: intervention: 9 (2 discontinued intervention: 1 hip fracture, 1 cardiac problem),<br />

5 unavailable <strong>for</strong> follow-up; control: 8 (1 withdrew from intervention, 7 unavailable<br />

<strong>for</strong> follow-up)<br />

Participants Randomised: 63 participants<br />

Intervention: 32 participants; 22 males and 10 females; age 62.9 years (SD 12); 52 days<br />

post-<strong>stroke</strong> (SD 22)<br />

Control: 31 participants; 21 males and 10 females; age 60.7 years (SD 12); 52.8 days post<strong>stroke</strong><br />

(SD 18)<br />

Inclusion criteria: first or second <strong>stroke</strong>; men or women aged 30 to 89 years; impaired<br />

walking; follow verbal instructions; Barthel ambulation score ?10; gait speed of 10 to 60<br />

cm/second<br />

Exclusion criteria: cerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage; major medical problems (cancer,<br />

heart conditions, diabetes); receptive or expressive aphasia; lower extremity musculoskeletal<br />

disorders affecting gait<br />

Interventions Intervention: mixed <strong>training</strong>: task-oriented gait <strong>training</strong> programme which used a limb-load<br />

monitor, resisted exercises using a Kinetron, and treadmill walking, intervention occurred<br />

during physiotherapy sessions of 60 minutes per day 5 days per week <strong>for</strong> 8 weeks, progression<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!