Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Flansbjer 2008<br />
Methods Design: randomised trial of resistance <strong>training</strong> versus no <strong>training</strong> - after usual care<br />
Randomisation: stratified unequal randomisation (2:1)<br />
Allocation concealment: non-sealed envelopes<br />
Blinding: physiotherapists who assessed isokinetic strength and gait per<strong>for</strong>mance outcomes<br />
were blinded to group assignment but the physiotherapist who assessed dynamic strength<br />
and muscle tone outcomes was not blinded; patient were not blinded but were told not to<br />
disclose group assignment<br />
Intention-to-treat: yes<br />
Measurements: at the end of intervention (10 weeks) and 5-month follow-up<br />
Withdrawals: 1 participant dropped out from the intervention group due to an accident<br />
unrelated to strength <strong>training</strong><br />
Participants Randomised: total 25 participants<br />
Intervention: 15 participants, 9 males and 6 females; mean age 61 (SD 5) years; time since<br />
<strong>stroke</strong> 18.9 (SD 7.9) months<br />
Control: 9 participants, 5 males and 4 females; mean age 60 (SD 5) years; time since <strong>stroke</strong><br />
20.0 (SD 11.6) months<br />
Inclusion criteria: age 40 to 70 years; 6 months post-<strong>stroke</strong>; able to per<strong>for</strong>m isolated extension<br />
and flexion movements of the knee; at least 15% reduction in muscle strength in the<br />
paretic limb (mean isokinetic peak torque at 60º/sec); walk unsupervised <strong>for</strong> 200 metres<br />
with or without walking aid; no medication, physical, cognitive or mental dysfunction that<br />
could impact upon knee muscle strength, gait per<strong>for</strong>mance or perceived participation; able<br />
to understand verbal and written in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Exclusion criteria: not reported<br />
Interventions Intervention group: 10 weeks of dynamic and isokinetic knee muscle strength <strong>training</strong>. Each<br />
<strong>training</strong> session started with a warm-up of 5 minutes of stationary cycling, 5 repetitions<br />
without resistance and 5 repetitions at 25% of maximum load. The participants then<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med 6 to 8 repetitions at about 80% of their maximum load with a 2-minute rest<br />
between each set. The participants per<strong>for</strong>med as many repetitions as possible. The load was<br />
adjusted every two weeks to remain at 80% of their maximum load. Each <strong>training</strong> session<br />
lasted about 90 minutes but the actual progressive strength <strong>training</strong> time was less than 6<br />
minutes.<br />
Control group: participants were encouraged to continue daily activities and <strong>training</strong> but<br />
not to engage in any progressive strength <strong>training</strong><br />
Setting: community dwelling; <strong>training</strong> in hospital<br />
Outcomes Included outcomes: dynamic and isokinetic muscle strength; 3-metre TUG; maximum<br />
walking speed; 6MWT; SIS - Swedish version; muscle tone assessed with the mAS<br />
Other outcomes: none<br />
Notes Maximum walking speed data obtained from authors. The physiotherapist that supervised<br />
the resistance <strong>training</strong> was the same that assessed dynamic strength and muscle tone outcomes<br />
Risk of bias<br />
Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
49