Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Mixed training versus control - end of retention follow-up, Outcome 1 Case
fatality.
Review: Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Comparison: 6 Mixed training versus control - end of retention follow-up
Outcome: 1 Case fatality
Study or subgroup Training Control Odds Ratio Weight Odds Ratio
1 During usual care
n/N n/N M-H,Random,95% CI M-H,Random,95% CI
Cooke 2010 0/36 2/31 27.8 % 0.16 [ 0.01, 3.50 ]
Subtotal (95% CI) 36 31 27.8 % 0.16 [ 0.01, 3.50 ]
Total events: 0 (Training), 2 (Control)
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.16 (P = 0.25)
2 After usual care
Duncan 2003 1/49 2/48 44.4 % 0.48 [ 0.04, 5.47 ]
Langhammer 2007 0/32 2/31 27.8 % 0.18 [ 0.01, 3.94 ]
Subtotal (95% CI) 81 79 72.2 % 0.33 [ 0.05, 2.23 ]
Total events: 1 (Training), 4 (Control)
Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.0; Chi 2 = 0.24, df = 1 (P = 0.63); I 2 =0.0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.14 (P = 0.25)
Total (95% CI) 117 110 100.0 % 0.27 [ 0.05, 1.37 ]
Total events: 1 (Training), 6 (Control)
Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.0; Chi 2 = 0.39, df = 2 (P = 0.82); I 2 =0.0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.58 (P = 0.11)
Test for subgroup differences: Chi 2 = 0.15, df = 1 (P = 0.70), I 2 =0.0%
0.002 0.1 1 10 500
Favours training Favours control
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review)
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
199