06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Continued)<br />

Franceschini 2009 Not valid comparison (treadmill gait <strong>training</strong> versus overground gait <strong>training</strong>)<br />

Gelber 1995 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: comparison of traditional functional re<strong>training</strong> and neurodevelopmental<br />

techniques. No relevant comparisons<br />

Gilbertson 1998 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: home-based occupational therapy<br />

Gregson 2006 Intervention was not <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>, it was repetitive practice with no progression of exercise load except<br />

<strong>for</strong> some participants initially unable to complete the target number of repetitions (10)<br />

Harrington 2010 Not valid comparison (exercise and education programme versus standard care)<br />

Harris 2009 Intervention does not meet the criteria <strong>for</strong> physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> (upper limb supplementary programme)<br />

Hart 2004 Control intervention not a valid comparison: not usual care, not non-exercise, and balance exercises<br />

confound<br />

Helbostad 2004 Only 16 of 77 participants with <strong>stroke</strong>. Not a valid comparison, both groups receiving home <strong>training</strong><br />

Hidler 2007 No a valid comparison: comparison of 2 types of <strong>training</strong><br />

Higgins 2006 Intervention not <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: experimental group dexterity practice. Control group not valid: included<br />

physical activity (walking)<br />

Howe 2005 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Hu 2003 Intervention (Bobath) not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Hu 2006 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Ishida 2001 Regular rehabilitation was suspended in some participants during a period of usual care<br />

Not an exercise intervention<br />

Jeong 2007 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> (rhythmic music and specialised rehabilitation movements)<br />

Jongbloed 1989 No relevant control group: comparison of 2 occupational therapy interventions. Interventions not physical<br />

<strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />

Jongbloed 1991 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: occupational therapy related to leisure activities<br />

Kamps 2005 Not relevant control group: participants recruited after usual care yet were exposed to physiotherapy and<br />

’ergotherapeutic’ interventions<br />

Klassen 2005 Not a valid control group: low intensity upper body exercise<br />

Kwakkel 1999 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: investigation of rehabilitation of functional tasks. The principal<br />

author clarified that there was no progression of <strong>training</strong> intensity, the content of <strong>training</strong> was variable,<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!