Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory ...$

23.2 After usual care 1 28 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 11.0 [6.15, 15.85] 24 Mood - Beck Depression Index 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [-1.60, 2.80] 24.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 24.2 After usual care 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.60 [-1.60, 2.80] 25 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - anxiety score 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.94 [-3.80, -0.08] 25.1 During usual care 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.94 [-3.80, -0.08] 25.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 26 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - depression score 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.40 [-3.21, 0.41] 26.1 During usual care 1 60 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.40 [-3.21, 0.41] 26.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] Comparison 2. Cardiorespiratory training versus control - end of retention follow-up Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size 1 Case fatality 1 81 Odds Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.04, 5.18] 2 Disability - Rivermead Mobility Index 1 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only 2.1 During usual care 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -0.25 [-1.85, 1.35] 2.2 During usual care - ITT analysis using ’last observation carried forward’ approach 1 84 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.04 [-1.47, 1.55] 2.3 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 3 Disability - Nottinghan Extended ADLs 1 147 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.90 [-2.68, 8.48] 3.1 During usual care 1 64 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.64 [-5.57, 10.85] 3.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 3.3 During usual care - ITT analysis using ’last observation carried forward’ approach 1 83 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 3.13 [-4.48, 10.74] 4 Disability - Physical Activity and 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 19.90 [-17.58, Disability Scale 57.38] 4.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 4.2 After usual care 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 19.90 [-17.58, 57.38] 5 Disability - Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) 1 79 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [-1.55, 3.55] 5.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 5.2 After usual care 1 79 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [-1.55, 3.55] 6 Physical fitness - maximum cycling work rate (Watts) 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 6.12 [-24.06, 36.30] 6.1 During usual care 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 6.12 [-24.06, 36.30] 6.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 91
7 Physical fitness - maximum cycling work rate (Watts) - ITT analysis using ’last observation carried forward’ approach 1 84 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.11 [-18.93, 29.15] 7.1 During usual care 1 84 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.11 [-18.93, 29.15] 7.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 8 Physical fitness - Body Mass (Kg) 1 64 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.81 [-4.63, 10.25] 8.1 During usual care 1 64 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.81 [-4.63, 10.25] 8.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 9 Mobility - maximal gait speed (m/min) 3 186 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 8.21 [3.38, 13.05] 9.1 During usual care 2 128 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 8.10 [1.98, 14.22] 9.2 After usual care 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 8.40 [0.52, 16.28] 10 Mobility - gait endurance 2 107 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 69.30 [33.38, (6-MWT metres) 105.23] 10.1 During usual care 1 49 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 61.80 [16.48, 107.12] 10.2 After usual care 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 82.0 [23.05, 140.95] 11 Mobility - peak activity index (steps/min) 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 12.20 [1.38, 23.02] 11.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 11.2 After usual care 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 12.20 [1.38, 23.02] 12 Mobility - max step rate in 1 min 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 12.10 [0.93, 23.27] 12.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 12.2 After usual care 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 12.10 [0.93, 23.27] 13 Mobility - Stroke Impact Scale (mobility domain) 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.90 [-7.97, 19.77] 13.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 13.2 After usual care 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 5.90 [-7.97, 19.77] 14 Physical function - Berg Balance scale 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -2.93 [-7.91, 2.05] 14.1 During usual care 1 66 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -2.93 [-7.91, 2.05] 14.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 15 Physical function - Berg Balance scale - ITT analysis using ’last observation carried forward’ approach 1 84 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -0.79 [-5.93, 4.35] 15.1 During usual care 1 84 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -0.79 [-5.93, 4.35] 15.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 16 Mood - Beck Depression Index 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.30 [-3.67, 1.07] 16.1 During usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 16.2 After usual care 1 20 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.30 [-3.67, 1.07] 17 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - anxiety score 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.6 [-3.58, 0.38] 17.1 During usual care 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -1.6 [-3.58, 0.38] 17.2 After usual care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] 18 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - depression score 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -2.7 [-4.40, 1.00] 18.1 During usual care 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) -2.7 [-4.40, 1.00] Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 92
Page 1 and 2:
Physical fitness training for strok
Page 3 and 4:
Analysis 1.19. Comparison 1 Cardior
Page 5 and 6:
Analysis 5.10. Comparison 5 Mixed t
Page 7 and 8:
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Cardiore
Page 9 and 10:
walking speed (mean difference (MD)
Page 11 and 12:
Post-stroke physical activity and f
Page 13 and 14:
Search methods for identification o
Page 15 and 16:
• type of training (cardiorespira
Page 17 and 18:
Compliance with the scheduled exerc
Page 19 and 20:
Case fatality Number of deaths was
Page 21 and 22:
we did not include these data in th
Page 23 and 24:
(Flansbjer 2008; Kim 2001; Ouellett
Page 25 and 26:
data were, however, confounded by a
Page 27 and 28:
Vascular risk factors A few trials
Page 29 and 30:
ical function outcomes did not impr
Page 31 and 32:
We thank the Cochrane Stroke Group
Page 33 and 34:
or relaxation. Proceedings of the U
Page 35 and 36:
Dean 1997 {published data only} Dea
Page 37 and 38:
(LEAPS): a randomized controlled tr
Page 39 and 40:
with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilit
Page 41 and 42:
Askim {published data only} Askim T
Page 43 and 44:
Hobart 2002 Hobart JC, Williams LS,
Page 45 and 46:
andomized controlled trials. Clinic
Page 47 and 48: Bale 2008 Methods Design: randomise
Page 49 and 50: Cooke 2010 Methods Design: phase I
Page 51 and 52: da Cunha 2002 Methods Design: rando
Page 53 and 54: Duncan 1998 Methods Design: randomi
Page 55 and 56: Eich 2004 Methods Design: randomise
Page 57 and 58: Flansbjer 2008 (Continued) Allocati
Page 59 and 60: James 2002 Methods Design: randomis
Page 61 and 62: Kim 2001 Methods Design: randomised
Page 63 and 64: Lennon 2008 Methods Design: pilot r
Page 65 and 66: Moore 2010 Methods Design: randomis
Page 67 and 68: Mudge 2009 (Continued) sessions (e.
Page 69 and 70: Pohl 2002 (Continued) Exclusion cri
Page 71 and 72: Richards 1993 (Continued) Intervent
Page 73 and 74: Salbach 2004 (Continued) Interventi
Page 75 and 76: Smith 2008 (Continued) Inclusion cr
Page 77 and 78: Winstein 2004 (Continued) sive hydr
Page 79 and 80: mAS: modified Ashworth Scale MAS: M
Page 81 and 82: (Continued) Franceschini 2009 Not v
Page 83 and 84: (Continued) Maeshima 2003 Not a rel
Page 85 and 86: (Continued) Thielman 2005 Not a rel
Page 87 and 88: Eng Trial name or title The effect
Page 89 and 90: Ivey (B) Trial name or title Streng
Page 91 and 92: Protas (Continued) Participants 48
Page 93 and 94: Suskin 2007 (Continued) Time frame:
Page 95 and 96: Wolff Trial name or title Effects o
Page 97: 11.2 After usual care 3 169 Mean Di
Page 101 and 102: 10.2 After usual care 1 20 Mean Dif
Page 103 and 104: 13 Physical fitness - muscle streng
Page 105 and 106: 36 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depr
Page 107 and 108: 21.2 After usual care 1 80 Mean Dif
Page 109 and 110: Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Cardiore
Page 117 and 118: Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Cardior
Page 149 and 150:
Analysis 2.17. Comparison 2 Cardior
Page 151 and 152:
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Resisten
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Analysis 3.11. Comparison 3 Resiste
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Mixed tr
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Cardiore
Page 233 and 234:
Table 1. Outline of the studies whi
Page 235 and 236:
Table 3. Outline of the studies whi
Page 237 and 238:
Table 4. Pooled walking data for ca
Page 239 and 240:
#42.(physical in Abstract and (exer
Page 241 and 242:
71 8 and 36 and 70 72 limit 71 to h
Page 243 and 244:
S58. (MH “Random Assignment”) o
Page 245 and 246:
W H A T ’ S N E W Last assessed a
Page 247:
MeSH check words Humans Physical fi
show all

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?